A comparison between the Dutch and American-English digits-in-noise (DIN) tests in normal-hearing listeners
- PMID: 26940045
- DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1137362
A comparison between the Dutch and American-English digits-in-noise (DIN) tests in normal-hearing listeners
Abstract
Objective: The Dutch digits-in-noise test (NL DIN) and the American-English version (US DIN) are speech-in-noise tests for diagnostic and clinical usage. The present study investigated differences between NL DIN and US DIN speech reception thresholds (SRTs) for a group of native Dutch-speaking listeners.
Design: In experiment 1, a repeated-measures design was used to compare SRTs for the NL DIN and US DIN in steady-state noise and interrupted noise for monaural, diotic, and dichotic listening conditions. In experiment 2, a subset of these conditions with additional speech material (i.e. US DIN triplets without inter-digit coarticulation/prosody) was used.
Study sample: Experiment 1 was conducted with 16 normal-hearing Dutch students. Experiment 2 was conducted with nine different students.
Results: No significant differences between SRTs measured with the NL DIN and US DIN were found in steady-state noise. In interrupted noise the US DIN SRTs were significantly better in monaural and diotic listening conditions. Experiment 2 demonstrated that these better SRTs cannot be explained by the combined effect of inter-digit coarticulation and prosody in the American-English triplets.
Conclusions: The NL DIN and US DIN are highly comparable and valuable tests for measuring auditory speech recognition abilities. These tests promote across-language comparisons of results.
Keywords: Speech in noise; coarticulation; dichotic; digits; diotic; interrupted noise; triplets.
Similar articles
-
Speech Recognition Abilities in Normal-Hearing Children 4 to 12 Years of Age in Stationary and Interrupted Noise.Ear Hear. 2018 Nov/Dec;39(6):1091-1103. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000569. Ear Hear. 2018. PMID: 29554035 Free PMC article.
-
Remote self-report and speech-in-noise measures predict clinical audiometric thresholds.Int J Audiol. 2025 Jun;64(6):618-626. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2024.2387291. Epub 2024 Aug 7. Int J Audiol. 2025. PMID: 39109478
-
The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Mar;133(3):1693-706. doi: 10.1121/1.4789933. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013. PMID: 23464039
-
The multilingual matrix test: Principles, applications, and comparison across languages: A review.Int J Audiol. 2015;54 Suppl 2:3-16. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1020971. Epub 2015 Sep 18. Int J Audiol. 2015. PMID: 26383182 Review.
-
The digit triplet test: a scoping review.Int J Audiol. 2021 Dec;60(12):946-963. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1902579. Epub 2021 Apr 11. Int J Audiol. 2021. PMID: 33840339
Cited by
-
Effect of Audibility and Suprathreshold Deficits on Speech Recognition for Listeners With Unilateral Hearing Loss.Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug;40(4):1025-1034. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000685. Ear Hear. 2019. PMID: 31242137 Free PMC article.
-
Development of Digit in Noise Test in Hindi.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Aug;76(4):3081-3087. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04606-x. Epub 2024 Mar 16. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024. PMID: 39130274 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Influencing the Korean Version of the Digit-in-Noise Test.J Audiol Otol. 2023 Apr;27(2):88-96. doi: 10.7874/jao.2022.00472. Epub 2023 Mar 23. J Audiol Otol. 2023. PMID: 36950808 Free PMC article.
-
Automatic development of speech-in-noise hearing tests using machine learning.Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 15;15(1):12878. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96312-z. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40234643 Free PMC article.
-
FreeHear: A New Sound-Field Speech-in-Babble Hearing Assessment Tool.Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216519872378. doi: 10.1177/2331216519872378. Trends Hear. 2019. PMID: 31599206 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical