Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2016 Mar 3;6(3):e009777.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009777.

Exploring the Current Landscape of Intravenous Infusion Practices and Errors (ECLIPSE): protocol for a mixed-methods observational study

Ann Blandford  1 , Dominic Furniss  1 , Imogen Lyons  1 , Gill Chumbley  2 , Ioanna Iacovides  1 , Li Wei  3 , Anna Cox  1 , Astrid Mayer  4 , Kumiko Schnock  5 , David Westfall Bates  5 , Patricia C Dykes  5 , Helen Bell  2 , Bryony Dean Franklin  6
Affiliations
Observational Study

Exploring the Current Landscape of Intravenous Infusion Practices and Errors (ECLIPSE): protocol for a mixed-methods observational study

Ann Blandford et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Intravenous medication is essential for many hospital inpatients. However, providing intravenous therapy is complex and errors are common. 'Smart pumps' incorporating dose error reduction software have been widely advocated to reduce error. However, little is known about their effect on patient safety, how they are used or their likely impact. This study will explore the landscape of intravenous medication infusion practices and errors in English hospitals and how smart pumps may relate to the prevalence of medication administration errors.

Methods and analysis: This is a mixed-methods study involving an observational quantitative point prevalence study to determine the frequency and types of errors that occur in the infusion of intravenous medication, and qualitative interviews with hospital staff to better understand infusion practices and the contexts in which errors occur. The study will involve 5 clinical areas (critical care, general medicine, general surgery, paediatrics and oncology), across 14 purposively sampled acute hospitals and 2 paediatric hospitals to cover a range of intravenous infusion practices. Data collectors will compare each infusion running at the time of data collection against the patient's medication orders to identify any discrepancies. The potential clinical importance of errors will be assessed. Quantitative data will be analysed descriptively; interviews will be analysed using thematic analysis.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval has been obtained from an NHS Research Ethics Committee (14/SC/0290); local approvals will be sought from each participating organisation. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences for academic and health professional audiences. Results will also be fed back to participating organisations to inform local policy, training and procurement. Aggregated findings will inform the debate on costs and benefits of the NHS investing in smart pump technology, and what other changes may need to be made to ensure effectiveness of such an investment.

Keywords: AUDIT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ECLIPSE patient observation form. ECLIPSE, Exploring the Current Landscape of Intravenous Infusion Practices and Errors.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. McLeod MC, Barber N, Franklin BD. Methodological variations and their effects on reported medication administration error rates. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22:278–89. 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001330 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Franklin BD, Taxis K, Barber N. Parenteral drug errors: reported error rates are likely to be underestimation. BMJ 2009;338:b1814 10.1136/bmj.b1814 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDowell SE, Mt-Isa S, Ashby D et al. . Where errors occur in the preparation and administration of intravenous medicines: a systematic review and Bayesian analysis. Qual Saf Healthcare 2010;19:341–5. 10.1136/qshc.2008.029785 - DOI - PubMed
    1. AAMI/FDA. Infusing Patients Safely: Priority Issues from the AAMI/FDA Infusion Device Summit. 2010. http://tinyurl.com/46l7ynq (accessed 29 Jul 2015).
    1. Murdoch LJ, Cameron VL. Smart infusion technology: a minimum safety standard for intensive care? Br J Nurs 2008;17:630–6. 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.10.29476 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types