Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2016 Mar 3:13:E33.
doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150440.

Assessment of Factors Contributing to Health Outcomes in the Eight States of the Mississippi Delta Region

Keith P Gennuso  1 , Amanda Jovaag  2 , Bridget B Catlin  2 , Matthew Rodock  2 , Hyojun Park  3
Affiliations
Observational Study

Assessment of Factors Contributing to Health Outcomes in the Eight States of the Mississippi Delta Region

Keith P Gennuso et al. Prev Chronic Dis. .

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this observational study was to examine the key contributors to health outcomes and to better understand the health disparities between Delta and non-Delta counties in 8 states in the Mississippi River Delta Region. We hypothesized that a unique set of contributors to health outcomes in the Delta counties could explain the disparities between Delta and non-Delta counties.

Methods: Data were from the 2014 County Health Rankings for counties in 8 states (Alabama, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee). We used the Delta Regional Authority definition to identify the 252 Delta counties and 468 non-Delta counties or county equivalents. Information on health factors (eg, health behaviors, clinical care) and outcomes (eg, mortality) were derived from 38 measures from the 2014 County Health Rankings. The contributions of health factors to health outcomes in Delta and non-Delta counties were examined using path analysis.

Results: We found similarities between Delta counties and non-Delta counties in the health factors (eg, tobacco use, diet and exercise) that significantly predicted the health outcomes of self-rated health and low birthweight. The most variation was seen in predictors of mortality; however, Delta counties shared 2 of the 3 significant predictors (ie, community safety and income) of mortality with non-Delta counties. On average across all measures, values in the Delta were 16% worse than in the non-Delta and 22% worse than in the rest of the United States.

Conclusion: The health status of Delta counties is poorer than that of non-Delta counties because the health factors that contribute to health outcomes in the entire region are worse in the Delta counties, not because of a unique set of health predictors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Delta counties (shaded [n = 252]) and non-Delta counties (n = 468) in the 8 states (Alabama, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee) that contain parts of the Mississippi River Delta Region.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Felix H, Stewart MK. Health status in the Mississippi River Delta region. South Med J 2005;98(2):149–54. 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000145304.68009.02 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cosby AG, Bowser DM. The health of the Delta Region: a story of increasing disparities. J Health Hum Serv Adm 2008;31(1):58–71. - PubMed
    1. Bloom DE, Bowser DM. The population health and income nexus in the Mississippi River Delta Region and beyond. J Health Hum Serv Adm 2008;31(1):105–23. - PubMed
    1. Remington PL, Catlin BB, Gennuso KP. The County Health Rankings: rationale and methods. Popul Health Metr 2015;13(1):11. 10.1186/s12963-015-0044-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute. County health rankings and roadmaps. http://www.countyhealthrankings.org/rankings/data. Accessed August 8, 2014.

Publication types