Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 4:6:22673.
doi: 10.1038/srep22673.

Action-space coding in social contexts

Affiliations

Action-space coding in social contexts

Francesca Ciardo et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

In two behavioural experiments we tested whether performing a spatial task along with another agent changes space representation by rendering some reference frames more/less salient than others. To this end, we used a Simon task in which stimuli were presented in four horizontal locations thus allowing for spatial coding according to multiple frames of reference. In Experiment 1 participants performed a go/no-go Simon task along another agent, each being in charge of one response. In Experiment 2 they performed a two-choice Simon task along another agent, each being in charge of two responses. Results showed that when participants were in charge of only one response, stimulus position was coded only with reference to the centre of the screen hence suggesting that the co-actor's response, or the position of the co-actor, was represented and used as a reference for spatial coding. Differently, when participants were in charge of two responses, no effect of the social context emerged and spatial coding relied on multiple frames of reference, similarly to when the Simon task is performed individually. These findings provide insights on the influence played by the interaction between the social context (i.e. the presence of others) and task features on individual performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the four locations in which the stimulus could appear, resulting for the manipulation of hemispace (left and right) and relative position (left and right).
Left hemispace refers to panels A and B; whereas right hemispace refers to panels C and D. Left relative position refers to panels A and C; whereas right relative position refers to panels B and D.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the display and experimental conditions used in Experiment 1 (left panel) and Experiment 2 (right panel).

References

    1. Dolk T. et al.. The joint Simon effect: a review and theoretical integration. Front. Psychol . 5, 974, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00974 (2014). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sebanz N., Bekkering H. & Knoblich G. Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cogn. Sci . 10, 70–76, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009 (2006). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Knoblich G., Butterfill S. & Sebanz N. [Psychological research on joint action: theory and data]. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 54 [ Ross B. (Ed.)] [59–101] (Academic Press, Burlington, MA, 2011).
    1. Simon J. R. & Rudell A. P. Auditory SR compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. J. Appl. Psychol. 51(3), 300–304, doi: 10.1037/h0020586 (1967). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Proctor R. W. & Vu K. P. L. Stimulus-response compatibility principles: Data, theory, and application (CRC Press, 2006).

LinkOut - more resources