Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2016 Mar 8;67(9):1027-1035.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.028.

Vena Caval Filter Utilization and Outcomes in Pulmonary Embolism: Medicare Hospitalizations From 1999 to 2010

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Vena Caval Filter Utilization and Outcomes in Pulmonary Embolism: Medicare Hospitalizations From 1999 to 2010

Behnood Bikdeli et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. .

Abstract

Background: Inferior vena caval filters (IVCFs) may prevent recurrent pulmonary embolism (PE). Despite uncertainty about their net benefit, patterns of use and outcomes of these devices in contemporary practice are unknown.

Objectives: The authors determined the trends in utilization rates and outcomes of IVCF placement in patients with PE and explored regional variations in use in the United States.

Methods: In a national cohort study of all Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries ≥65 years of age with principal discharge diagnoses of PE between 1999 and 2010, rates of IVCF placement per 100,000 beneficiary-years and per 1,000 patients with PE were determined. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates after IVCF placement were also investigated.

Results: Among 556,658 patients hospitalized with PE, 94,427 underwent IVCF placement. Between 1999 and 2010, the number of PE hospitalizations with IVCF placement increased from 5,003 to 8,928, representing an increase in the rate per 100,000 beneficiary-years from 19.0 to 32.5 (p < 0.001 for both). As the total number of PE hospitalizations increased (from 31,746 in 1999 to 54,392 in 2010), the rate of IVCF placement per 1,000 PE hospitalizations did not change significantly (from 157.6 to 164.1, p = 0.11). Results were consistent across demographic subgroups, although IVCF use was higher in blacks and patients ≥85 years of age. IVCF utilization varied widely across regions, with the highest rate in the South Atlantic region and the lowest rate in the Mountain region.

Conclusions: In a period of increasing PE hospitalizations among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, IVCF placement increased as utilization rates in patients with PE remained greater than 15%. Mortality associated with PE hospitalizations is declining, regardless of IVCF use.

Keywords: deep vein thrombosis; mortality; trends.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Proportion of Medicare FFS Patients with PE with and without IVCF Placement in 1999 and 2010
Shown are the number of patients with PE, those that received IVCFs, and the fatalities in those who did and did not receive IVCFs. The size of each rectangle is proportionate to the number of patients in each subgroup. Note that the number of deaths in the entire cohort, as well as among those with and without IVCFs increased from 1999 to 2010. However, in the context of increasing PE hospitalizations (denominator), the mortality rates declined in all cohorts, with most notable decline in the subgroup that did not receive an IVCF. The fatalities in the figure represent 30-day unadjusted deaths. Adjusted 30-day and 1-year fatalities follow a similar pattern. FFS: Fee-For-Service, IVCF: inferior vena caval filter PE: pulmonary embolism.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Rates of Inferior Vena Caval Filter Placement Across 9 U.S. Regions in 1999 and 2010
Note the changes in 2010 compared with 1999, including the decline in the New England and the increase in most other regions. Rates are reported per 1,000 patients with PE. South Atlantic: Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Washington D.C., and West Virginia. New England: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Mid Atlantic: New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. East North Center: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin. East South Center: Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, and Tennessee. West South Center: Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas. Pacific: Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington. West North Center: Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota. Mountains: Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming
Central Illustration
Central Illustration
IVC Filters in Older Adults with Pulmonary Embolism: Mortality and Hospitalization Rates from 1999 to 2010.

Comment in

References

    1. Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F, et al. A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prevention du Risque d’Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:409–15. - PubMed
    1. Group PS. Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d’Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study. Circulation. 2005;112:416–22. - PubMed
    1. Mismetti P, Laporte S, Pellerin O, et al. Effect of a retrievable inferior vena cava filter plus anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone on risk of recurrent pulmonary embolism: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313:1627–35. - PubMed
    1. Barginear MF, Gralla RJ, Bradley TP, et al. Investigating the benefit of adding a vena cava filter to anticoagulation with fondaparinux sodium in patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism in a prospective randomized clinical trial. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:2865–72. - PubMed
    1. Jaff MR, McMurtry MS, Archer SL, et al. Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123:1788–830. - PubMed

Publication types