Number of Sexual Partners and Relationship Status Are Associated With Unprotected Sex Across Emerging Adulthood
- PMID: 26940966
- PMCID: PMC5806124
- DOI: 10.1007/s10508-016-0692-8
Number of Sexual Partners and Relationship Status Are Associated With Unprotected Sex Across Emerging Adulthood
Abstract
Sex with multiple partners, consecutively or concurrently, is a risk factor for contracting sexually transmitted infections (STIs) as multiple partner-partner contacts present increased opportunity for transmission. It is unclear, however, if individuals who tend to have more partners also use protection less reliably than those with sexual histories of fewer partners. Longitudinal data can elucidate whether an individual shows a consistent pattern of sex with multiple partners. We used latent class growth analyses to examine emerging adult survey data (N = 2244) spanning 10 waves of assessment across 6 years. We identified three trajectory classes described with respect to number of partners as (a) Multiple, (b) Single, and (c) Rare. Trajectory group, relationship status, and their interactions were tested as predictors of using protection against STIs and pregnancy at each wave. The Multiple Partners class had the greatest odds ratio of reporting sex without protection against STIs and pregnancy, followed by the Single and Rare classes. Exclusive relationship status was a risk factor for unprotected sex at earlier waves, but a protective factor at most later waves. There was no significant interaction between relationship status and trajectory class in predicting use of protection. The Multiple Partners class reported more permissive values on sex and an elevated proportion of homosexual behavior. This group overlaps with an already identified at-risk population, men who have sex with men. Potential mechanisms explaining the increased risk for sex without protection, including communication, risk assessment, and co-occurring risk behaviors are discussed as targets for intervention.
Keywords: Emerging adults; Multiple sex partners; Sexual risk behavior; Trajectory analysis; Unprotected sex.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Akaike H. Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika. 1987;52(3):317–332.
-
- American College Health Association. American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment Spring 2008 Reference Group Data Report (abridged): The American College Health Association. Journal of American College Health. 2009;57(5):477–488. doi: 10.3200/JACH.57.5.477-488. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist. 2000;55(5):469. - PubMed
-
- Asparouhov T, Muthén B. Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: 3-step approaches using Mplus. Mplus Web Notes. 2013;15:1–24.
-
- Bogle KA. Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: NYU Press; 2008.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
