Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
- PMID: 26941311
- DOI: 10.1126/science.aad7243
Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
Abstract
A paper from the Open Science Collaboration (Research Articles, 28 August 2015, aac4716) attempting to replicate 100 published studies suggests that the reproducibility of psychological science is surprisingly low. We show that this article contains three statistical errors and provides no support for such a conclusion. Indeed, the data are consistent with the opposite conclusion, namely, that the reproducibility of psychological science is quite high.
Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Comment in
-
Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science".Science. 2016 Mar 4;351(6277):1037. doi: 10.1126/science.aad9163. Science. 2016. PMID: 26941312
-
Failure to replicate?Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Apr;78(3):721-2. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1095-6. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016. PMID: 26988566 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716. Science. 2015. PMID: 26315443
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
