Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:2:6.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0047-1. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

Formative research to reduce mine worker respirable silica dust exposure: a feasibility study to integrate technology into behavioral interventions

Emily Joy Haas, Dana Willmer, Andrew B Cecala

Formative research to reduce mine worker respirable silica dust exposure: a feasibility study to integrate technology into behavioral interventions

Emily Joy Haas et al. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016.

Abstract

Background: The use of formative research as a critical component of intervention planning is highly supported in the literature. However, studies that report such processes in practice are minimal. This paper reports on the formative data collection and analysis that informed the development of a multilevel intervention that utilizes mine assessment technology to bridge health communication between workers and management to reduce mine worker overexposure to respirable silica dust.

Methods: Formative research to assess the feasibility and utility of this intervention design included stakeholder meetings and feedback, mine visits and observations, interviews with mine workers, and a focus group with mine management. Data collection took place at several US industrial mineral mine sites and a southeastern regional safety meeting. Interviews inquired about workers' perceived susceptibility and severity to respirable silica exposure, barriers to preventing overexposure, behaviors that reduce exposure, and perceptions about respirable dust-monitoring technology. A focus group discussed mine stakeholders' uses of various dust assessment technology.

Results: The data was qualitatively analyzed and coded using a thematic and theoretical analysis. Researchers found recurring themes for both target audiences that informed the need and subsequent development of a mixed-method multilevel intervention to improve communication quantity and quality around dust-control practices.

Conclusions: Results indicate that formative research is critical to: identify and develop an intervention that meets target audience needs; accurately represent the health problem; and develop positive relationships with research partners and stakeholders.

Keywords: Behavioral intervention; Dust assessment technology; Formative research; Mine health and safety; Risk communication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(From left to right) video camera attached to helmet, dust monitor and video monitor, and safety vest to hold instrumentation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Health communication program cycle ([50], pg. 22)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Formative research process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Atkin C, Freimuth V. Formative evaluation research in campaign design. In: Rice RE, Atkin CK, editors. Public communication campaigns. 2. Newbury Park: Sage; 1989. pp. 131–50.
    1. Baumgartner TA, Strong CH, Hensley LD. Conducting and reading research in health and human performance. 3. New York: McGraw Hill; 2002.
    1. Bentley ME, Johnson SL, Wasser H, Creed-Kanashiro H, Shroff M, Rao SF, et al. Formative research methods for designing culturally appropriate, integrated child nutrition and development interventions: an overview. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014;1308:54–67. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12290. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bentley ME, Tolley EE, Pequegnat W. Qualitative inquiry: an end not just a means. In: Pequegnat W, Stover E, Boyce CA, editors. How to write a successful research grant application: A guide for social and behavioral scientists. New York: Springer; 2011. pp. 153–72.
    1. Bernard HR. Research methods in anthropology. Walnut Creek: AltaMira; 1995.

LinkOut - more resources