Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Feb;7(1):143-57.
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.112.

Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy: an evidence-based review-past, present and future

Affiliations
Review

Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy: an evidence-based review-past, present and future

Ahmed Dehal et al. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) has historically been considered a terminal condition with merely palliative treatment achieving a survival rate measured in months. Cytoreductive surgery (CyRS) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) have emerged as potentially effective regional treatments with the potential for long-term survival in well-selected patients. The fundamentals of CyRS and IPC are patient selection and complete cytoreduction. Since there is now sufficient evidence for the superiority of CyRS and IPC to systemic chemotherapy alone in a highly select group of patients, surgeons and oncologists should be aware of this modality as a potential benefit for patients with PC. The aim of this report is to highlight cancer-specific evidence in the context of ongoing studies regarding the outcome of this treatment.

Keywords: Cytoreductive surgery (CyRS); appendiceal mucinous neoplasms; colorectal cancer (CRC); early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC); gastric cancer; hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC); intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC); ovarian cancer and mixed types of peritoneal cancer (OC and mixed types of peritoneal cancer); peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC); peritoneal mesothelioma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ICARuS (Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy After CytoReductive Surgery) trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A phase II randomized study for outcomes after secondary cytoreductive surgery with or without carboplatin HIPEC followed by systemic combination chemotherapy for recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer. Shown is the schema for the study. After 1st platinum sensitive recurrence is identified the patients will be randomized intra-operatively after all eligibility criteria are met. Each arm includes 49 patients and post-operatively the patients will receive 5 cycles of standard IV chemotherapy in the HIPEC arm or 6 cycles in the non-HIPEC arm. Courtesy of Dennis Chi, MD (with permission) (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01767675). CyRS, cytoreductive surgery; HIPEC, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

References

    1. Jafari MD, Halabi WJ, Stamos MJ, et al. Surgical outcomes of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: analysis of the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. JAMA Surg 2014;149:170-5. - PubMed
    1. Sadeghi B, Arvieux C, Glehen O, et al. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from non-gynecologic malignancies: results of the EVOCAPE 1 multicentric prospective study. Cancer 2000;88:358-63. - PubMed
    1. Ung L, Chua T, Morris D. Peritoneal metastases of lower gastrointestinal tract origin: A comparative study of patient outcomes following cytoreduction and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2013;139:1899-908. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brücher BL, Piso P, Verwaal V, et al. Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC-Overview and Basics. Cancer Invest 2012;30:209-24. - PubMed
    1. Kelly KJ, Nash GM. Peritoneal debulking/intraperitoneal chemotherapy-non-sarcoma. J Surg Oncol 2014;109:14-22. - PubMed