Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug 20;5(1):e1072671.
doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1072671. eCollection 2016.

Comparison of naïve and central memory derived CD8+ effector cell engraftment fitness and function following adoptive transfer

Affiliations

Comparison of naïve and central memory derived CD8+ effector cell engraftment fitness and function following adoptive transfer

Xiuli Wang et al. Oncoimmunology. .

Abstract

Human CD8+ effector T cells derived from CD45RO+CD62L+ precursors enriched for central memory (TCM) precursors retain the capacity to engraft and reconstitute functional memory upon adoptive transfer, whereas effectors derived from CD45RO+CD62L- precursors enriched for effector memory precursors do not. Here we sought to compare the engraftment fitness and function of CD8+ effector T cells derived from CD45RA+CD62L+ precursors enriched for naïve and stem cell memory precursors (TN/SCM) with that of TCM. We found that cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) derived from TCM transcribed higher levels of CD28, FOS, INFγ, Eomesodermin (Eomes), and lower levels of BCL2L11, maintained higher levels of phosphorylated AKT, and displayed enhanced sensitivity to the proliferative and anti-apoptotic effects of γ-chain cytokines compared to CTLs derived from TN/SCM. Higher frequencies of CTLs derived from TCM retained CD28 expression and upon activation secreted higher levels of IL-2. In NOD/Scid IL-2RγCnull mice, CD8+ TCM derived CTLs engrafted to higher frequencies in response to human IL-15 and mounted robust proliferative responses to an immunostimulatory vaccine. Similarly, CD8+ TCM derived CD19CAR+ CTLs exhibited superior antitumor potency following adoptive transfer compared to their CD8+ TN/SCM derived counterparts. These studies support the use of TCM enriched cell products for adoptive therapy of cancer.

Keywords: Antitumor activity; adoptive therapy; central memory T cell derived CTLs; engraftment fitness; naïve T cell derived CTLs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Frequency and phenotypic attributes of CD8+ TN/SCM and CD8+ TCM from healthy donor peripheral blood. (A) Representative gating/sorting strategy for CD8+CD45RA+CD62L+ TN/SCM vs. CD8+CD45RO+CD62L+ TCM. (B) Analysis of PBMC from eight different healthy donors gated on the CD8+ population and analyzed for CD45RA+CD62L+ TN/SCM and CD45RO+CD62L+ TCM by multicolor flow cytometry. (C) Percentages of immunoreactive cells in each population are indicated (mean + SEM, n = 8). * p< 0.05 when comparing TN/SCM and TCM using a paired Student’s t-test.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Effector cells derived from CD8+ TCM precursors expressed higher levels of CD28 and IL-2 production upon stimulation. Purified CD8+ TN/SCM and CD8+ TCM were subject to 14 d in vitro REM stimulation in the presence of rhIL-2 (50U/mL). (A) Phenotypic analysis of differentiated effector cells derived from CD8+ TN/SCM (TN/SCM CTL) and CD8+ TCM (TCM CTL) following expansion. Mean percentages of immunoreactive cells + SEM from 4 different donors are presented (**p < 0.01, *p < 0.05). (B) Representive flow cytometric analysis of CD28 on the CTLs derived from CD8+ TN/SCM and CD8+ TCM. (C) Supernatants were collected after overnight co-incubation of either unstimulated CD8+ TN/SCM and CD8+TCM or stimulated CD8+ TN/SCM and CD8+TCM with OKT3 expressing LCL. Cytokine levels (means +SEM of triplicate wells) were determined using cytometric bead array. **p < 0.01. Representative data of 4 experiments are depicted. (D) After 14 d of stimulation, RNA was extracted and analyzed for genes that confer differentiation, survival, and apoptotic qualities of effector T cells and 4 control genes including housekeeping genes, RT control and positive PCR control. Medians of fold change of CD28, FOS, IFNγ, Eomes and BCL2L11 mRNA from cells derived from CD8+ TCM (TCM CTL) vs. CD8+ TN/SCM (TN/SCM CTL) from 4 individual donors are presented. **p < 0.01. (E) Effector T cells derived from CD8+ TN/SCM (TN/SCM CTL) (blue) and CD8+TCM (TCM CTL) (red) were stained for intracellular phosphorylated AKT (pAKT). Fluorochrome conjugated isotype matched antibody stained cells are shown in black. (F) Percentages of AKT+ cells from 4 donors are presented.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Effector cells derived from CD8+TCM precursors displayed greater ability to persist and expand in vitro. Purified CD8+ TN/SCM and CD8+ TCM were expanded 14 d in vitro using a REM in the presence of rhIL-2 (50U/mL). (A) After 14 d of in vitro stimulation, the effector cells from each population (TN/SCM CTL and TCM CTL) were stained with antibodies to the indicated cytokine receptor and analyzed by flow cytometry. Histograms show the mean fluorescence intensities (MFIs) of γ-chain cytokine receptor positive cells (black) after subtraction from the isotype controls (open). Representative data of 4 experiments are depicted. (B) Positivity of IL-2 receptors from four different donors is presented. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. (C) Percentages of IL-15Rα from a cohort of four donors are presented. (D) After the initial expansion, the TN/SCM CTL and TCM CTL cells were maintained in rhIL-2 (50U/mL) (left) or rhIL-15 (10ng/mL) (right). Cytokines were supplemented every other day. Viable cell numbers were determined by Guava ViaCount at the indicated time points.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Effector cells derived from CD8+TCM precursors exhibited superior engraftment fitness in NSG mice. After 14 d of in vitro stimulation, effector cells derived from CD8+ TN/SCM (TN/SCM CTL) and CD8+TCM (TCM CTL) (107) were infused i.v. into huIL-15-replete NSG mice. (A) Three weeks after adoptive transfer, human T cells in the peripheral blood, BM and spleen of recipient mice were determined by flow cytometric analysis using antibodies specific for human CD45 and CD8. Means+SEM of a total of 6 mice per T cell subset in a representative experiment are depicted. **p < 0.01, using a Mann–Whitney test. (B) Percentages of CD62L, CD27, CD28, and IL7Rα positive cells on gated human CD45+ positive cells of pooled peripheral blood, BM and spleens are indicated. *p < 0.05 **p < 0.01 using a Mann–Whitney test. (C) TCR vβ repertoire of the effectors derived from CD8+ TN/SCM and CD8+TCM before and after infusion. Percentage (%) of human CD3+ cells that were positive for the indicated TCR vβ genes was determined by flow cytometry. (D) For in vivo stimulation, 107 irradiated OKT3-expressing LCL (+OKT3) were injected i.v. into mice that had been engrafted (3 days) with CD8+ TN/SCM or CD8+TCM derived CTLs. Human T cells in peripheral blood were determined 7 d post in vivo challenge. ***p < 0.001. **p < 0.01.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Engineered CD19 specific T cells derived from CD8+ TCM (TCM-CD19R) displayed superior engraftment fitness and antitumor activity as compared to that from CD8+ TN/SCM (TN/SCM-CD19R). CD8+ TN/SCM and CD8+ TCM that had been transduced to express a CD19-specitic CAR (CD19R:CD28:ζ) and huEGFRt selection marker, were enriched for EGFRt+ cells and further expanded by REM stimulation in the presence of rhIL-2 and rhIL-15. (A) Purified EGFRt+ populations after 3 cycles of REM were flow cytometrically analyzed for expression of CD8+ as well as the CAR and EGFRt transgenes (using anti-Fc and Erbitux reagents, respectively) (B) Fold expansion of the purified EGFRt+ TN/SCM-CD19R and TCM-CD19R cells within the third cycle of REM stimulation. (C) Relative telomere length of the expanded cells. (D) The expanded TN/SCM-CD19R and TCM-CD19R cells (107) were adoptively infused into huIL-15 reconstituted NSG mice. Human T cells in the BM were analyzed by flow cytometry at indicated time points (3 mice per time point). ND, not detectable. (E) CD19+ffluc+LCLs (106) were inoculated into NSG mice i.v. on day -4. Expanded TN/SCM-CD19R and TCM-CD19R cells (107) were adoptively transferred (i.v.) into the huIL-15-reconstituted, tumor-bearing mice on day 0. Tumors were monitored with biophotonic imaging. Representative mouse images and mean photon flux ± SEM of each group (N = 6) are depicted.*, p < 0.05 using Mann–Whitney t-test. Representative data from two separate experiments are presented.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grupp SA, Kalos M, Barrett D, Aplenc R, Porter DL, Rheingold SR, Teachey DT, Chew A, Hauck B, Wright JF et al.. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for acute lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2013; 368:1509-18; PMID:23527958; http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1215134 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kalos M, Levine BL, Porter DL, Katz S, Grupp SA, Bagg A, June CH. T cells with chimeric antigen receptors have potent antitumor effects and can establish memory in patients with advanced leukemia. Sci Transl Med 2011; 3:95ra73; PMID:21832238; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3002842 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brentjens RJ, Davila ML, Riviere I, Park J, Wang X, Cowell LG, Bartido S, Stefanski J, Taylor C, Olszewska M et al.. CD19-targeted T cells rapidly induce molecular remissions in adults with chemotherapy-refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci Transl Med 2013; 5:177ra38; PMID:23515080; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3005930 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kochenderfer JN, Dudley ME, Feldman SA, Wilson WH, Spaner DE, Maric I, Stetler-Stevenson M, Phan GQ, Hughes MS, Sherry RM et al.. B-cell depletion and remissions of malignancy along with cytokine-associated toxicity in a clinical trial of anti-CD19 chimeric-antigen-receptor-transduced T cells. Blood 2012; 119:2709-20; PMID:22160384; http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-10-384388 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang X, Berger C, Wong CW, Forman SJ, Riddell SR, Jensen MC. Engraftment of human central memory-derived effector CD8+ T cells in immunodeficient mice. Blood 2011; 117:1888-98; PMID:21123821; http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-10-310599 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types