Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016:2016:3285179.
doi: 10.1155/2016/3285179. Epub 2016 Jan 28.

Do We Pay Enough Attention to Culture Conditions in Context of Perinatal Outcome after In Vitro Fertilization? Up-to-Date Literature Review

Affiliations
Review

Do We Pay Enough Attention to Culture Conditions in Context of Perinatal Outcome after In Vitro Fertilization? Up-to-Date Literature Review

Piotr Marianowski et al. Biomed Res Int. 2016.

Abstract

Adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton IVF pregnancies have been most often explained by parental underlying diseases and so far laboratory conditions during embryo culture are still not explored well. The following review discusses the current state of knowledge on the influence of IVF laboratory procedures on the possible perinatal outcome. The role of improved media for human embryo culture is unquestionable. Addition of certain components to culture media and their effect on embryo survival and implantation rates have been taken into consideration recently and studied on animal model. Impact of media on perinatal outcome in IVF offspring has also been studied. It has been discovered that epigenetic changes and neonatal birth weight are probably associated with the use of specific culture media, as is the relation between placental size and its influence on perinatal outcome. There are still questions in the discussion about duration of embryo culture (cleavage stage versus blastocyst transfer). Some of the IVF methods, such as in vitro maturation of oocytes and freezing/thawing procedures, also require well-powered randomized controlled trials in order to define their exact impact on perinatal outcome. Constant further research is needed to assess the impact of laboratory environment on fetal and postnatal development.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Pinborg A., Wennerholm U. B., Romundstad L. B., et al. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update. 2013;19(2):87–104. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms044. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malizia B. A., Hacker M. R., Penzias A. S. Cumulative live-birth rates after in vitro fertilization. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2009;360(3):236–243. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa0803072. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pandey S., Shetty A., Hamilton M., Bhattacharya S., Maheshwari A. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update. 2012;18(5):485–503. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Romundstad L. B., Romundstad P. R., Sunde A., et al. Effects of technology or maternal factors on perinatal outcome after assisted fertilisation: a population-based cohort study. The Lancet. 2008;372(9640):737–743. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61041-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sazonova A., Källen K., Thurin-Kjellberg A., Wennerholm U.-B., Bergh C. Factors affecting obstetric outcome of singletons born after IVF. Human Reproduction. 2011;26(10):2878–2886. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der241. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources