Incidental Pineal Cysts: Is Surveillance Necessary?

Abstract

Objective: The natural history of incidental pineal cysts is poorly understood. Neurosurgeons and neuroradiologists are more frequently faced with this disease in the advent of higher-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning. We aim to suggest a suitable surveillance strategy for these patients.

Methods: All patients who had MRI of the brain between June 2007 and January 2014 (n = 42,099) at The Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery were included. Radiologic reports containing the terms "pineal" and "cyst" were reviewed to identify patients.

Results: A total of 281 patients were identified with pineal cysts. The principal indication for head MRI was headache (50.2%), although no symptoms were deemed attributable to pineal disease. A total of 178 patients (63.3%) were female, and the age at diagnosis ranged from 16 to 84 years. The median size of pineal cyst at diagnosis was 10 mm. A total of 181 patients had subsequent follow-up at a median time of 6 months (range, 1-68). Eleven pineal cysts (6%) changed size during the follow-up period. Four patients had a reduction in cyst size; the median change was 2.5 mm. A further 7 pineal cysts increased in cyst size; the median change was 2 mm. No patients developed complications.

Conclusions: Incidental pineal cysts typically show a benign course. In the adult population, they do not require long-term neurosurgical follow-up, because pineal cysts tend to remain a stable size. In asymptomatic patients, we recommend a single follow-up MRI scan at 12 months to confirm diagnosis. The patient should then be discharged if the cyst remains stable.

Keywords: Asymptomtic; Epidemiology; Follow-Up; Incidental; Pineal cyst; Surveillance.