Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2016 Oct;26(10):3401-11.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4224-7. Epub 2016 Mar 5.

Radiological and clinical predictors of long-term outcome in rotator cuff calcific tendinitis

Affiliations
Observational Study

Radiological and clinical predictors of long-term outcome in rotator cuff calcific tendinitis

Pieter Bas de Witte et al. Eur Radiol. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: Knowledge on the epidemiology and long-term course of rotator cuff calcific tendinitis (RCCT) is scarce. We assessed demographics, radiological characteristics, and their association with long-term outcomes in a large patient group.

Methods: Baseline demographics, radiological characteristics and treatment were recorded in 342 patients. Interobserver agreement of radiological measures was analyzed. Long-term outcome was evaluated with questionnaires (WORC, DASH). The association of baseline characteristics with outcome was assessed.

Results: Mean age was 49.0 (SD = 10.0), and 59.5 % were female. The dominant arm was affected in 66.0 %, and 21.3 % had bilateral disease. Calcifications were on average 18.7 mm (SD = 10.1, ICC = 0.84 (p < 0.001)) and located 10.1 mm (SD = 11.8) medially to the acromion (ICC = 0.77 (p < 0.001)). Gärtner type I calcifications were found in 32.1 % (Kappa = 0.47 (p < 0.001)). After 14 years (SD = 7.1) of follow-up, median WORC was 72.5 (range, 3.0-100.0; WORC < 60 in 42 %) and median DASH 17.0 (range, 0.0-82.0). Female gender, dominant arm involvement, bilateral disease, longer duration of symptoms, and multiple calcifications were associated with inferior WORC. DASH results were similar.

Conclusions: Many subjects have persisting shoulder complaints years after diagnosis, regardless of treatment. Female gender, dominant arm involvement, bilateral disease, longer duration of symptoms, and multiple calcifications were associated with inferior outcome. Radiological measures had moderate-to-good reliability and no prognostic value.

Key points: • Most RCCT studies report on short-term outcome and/or small patients groups. • In this large, long-term observational study, RCCT appeared to not be self-limiting in many subjects. • Negative prognostic factors included female gender, more calcifications, dominant arm affected, and longer duration of symptoms. • Interobserver agreement of general radiological RCCT measures is moderate to good. • More rigorous diagnostics and treatment might be needed in specific RCCT cases.

Keywords: Calcific tendinitis; Epidemiology; Long-term; Rotator cuff; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flowchart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Locations of the calcific deposits were evaluated using the system of Ogon et al., which we refer to as Location in this paper [3]. A line perpendicular to the most lateral border of the acromion is drawn, parallel to the glenoid, on external rotation AP radiographs. Location is the distance (mm) between this line and the medial border of the calcification, where negative values represent a medial calcification border, i.e. between the glenoid and the drawn line
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Examples of Gärtner calcification classification types [6]. A) Gärtner type I: sharp border and a dense structure; B) Gärtner type II: either a sharp border and an inhomogeneous structure or a vague border and a homogenous structure; C) Gärtner type III: a vague border, more or less transparent in structure and a cloudy appearance
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Histograms of the clinical scores A) WORC score: 55 % had inferior long-term functional outcome, with scores below 80 percentage points; B) DASH score: 45 % scored had scores over 20 points, indicating disability

References

    1. Clavert P, Sirveaux F. Shoulder calcifying tendinitis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008;94:336–355. doi: 10.1016/j.rco.2008.09.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Diehl P, Gerdesmeyer L, Gollwitzer H, Sauer W, Tischer T. Calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Orthopade. 2011;40:733–746. doi: 10.1007/s00132-011-1817-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ogon P, Suedkamp NP, Jaeger M, Izadpanah K, Koestler W, Maier D. Prognostic factors in nonoperative therapy for chronic symptomatic calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:2978–2984. doi: 10.1002/art.24845. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Speed CA, Hazleman BL. Calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1582–1584. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199905203402011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Witte PB, Selten JW, Navas A, et al. Calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff: a randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-guided needling and lavage versus subacromial corticosteroids. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:1665–1673. doi: 10.1177/0363546513487066. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms