Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars - the effect of osteotomy at two speeds on peripheral bone: a histopathological analysis
- PMID: 26947110
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.02.008
Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars - the effect of osteotomy at two speeds on peripheral bone: a histopathological analysis
Abstract
The aim of this study was to find out the ideal speed for making a precise osteotomy with minimal damage to the surrounding bone. Thirty-six patients were divided into two groups (n=18 in each) depending on the speed of the handpiece used for osteotomy (slow=20000rpm and fast=40000rpm). Samples were taken from the peripheral bone and examined histologically to measure the margins of the osteotomy, the amount of debris produced, and the degree of thermal osteonecrosis. The osteotomy made with the high speed handpiece was better than that made with the low speed one on all counts. The margins in the high speed group were more or less precisely as required, with less debris and no thermal necrosis, which illustrated the efficacy of a high speed osteotomy. These findings can apply to other procedures that involve osteotomies in maxillofacial surgery.
Keywords: Impacted tooth; Osteotomy; Third molar surgery.
Copyright © 2016 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Measure Of Frequency Of Alveolar Osteitis Using Two Different Methods Of Osteotomy In Mandibular Third Molar Impactions: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2018 Jan-Mar;30(1):103-106. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2018. PMID: 29504342 Clinical Trial.
-
[Evaluation of the results of high-speed handpiece and minimally invasive extraction in impacted mandibular third molar extraction].Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2015 Aug;24(4):489-92. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2015. PMID: 26383579 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
Comparison of clinical parameters and environmental noise levels between regular surgery and piezosurgery for extraction of impacted third molars.J Formos Med Assoc. 2015 Oct;114(10):929-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Mar 21. J Formos Med Assoc. 2015. PMID: 24661578 Clinical Trial.
-
[Comparison of piezosurgery and chisel osteotomy in the extraction of mandibular impacted third molars].Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Aug;29(4):372-4. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011. PMID: 21932656 Chinese.
-
Extraction of a deeply impacted lower third molar by sagittal split osteotomy.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Nov;108(5):e36-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.07.003. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009. PMID: 19836712
Cited by
-
Piezosurgery versus conventional rotary surgery for impacted third molars: A randomised, split-mouth, clinical pilot trial.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2024 Jan 1;29(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4317/medoral.25929. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2024. PMID: 37992138 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The influence of electrical high-speed rotation on mandibular third molar surgeries: a prospective, randomized, split-mouth clinical and radiographic study.Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 17;14(1):8828. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59611-5. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38632471 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative analysis of bone healing in subcritical defects with air turbine and electric handpiece in a rat model.PLoS One. 2024 Dec 30;19(12):e0312280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312280. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39774839 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources