Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Apr:100:147-66.
doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.01.010. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

Mucositis in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and systemic therapies: Literature review and consensus statements

Affiliations
Review

Mucositis in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and systemic therapies: Literature review and consensus statements

Vitaliana De Sanctis et al. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Oral mucositis (OM) due to radiotherapy and systemic therapies in head and neck cancer treatment represents a major problem causing a wide spectrum of clinical signs and symptoms. This adverse event may reduce quality of life, resulting from debilitating oral pain, bleeding, dysphagia, infections, impairment of food intake, high rate of hospitalization and may interfere with the delivery of programmed treatment plans, ultimately jeopardizing patient outcome. Globally, there is a lack of evidence on effective measures for the prevention and treatment of OM, and only scant uniform conclusions and recommendations can be derived from the existing literature and guidelines. A multidisciplinary team of Italian head and neck cancer experts met in Milan 17-18 February 2013 with the aim of reaching consensus on prophylaxis and management of mucositis. The results of the literature review and the statements that achieved consensus are reported and discussed in this paper.

Material and methods: The Delphi Appropriateness Method was used as a structured communication method for achieving consensus. Subsequently, external expert reviewers evaluated the conclusions carefully according to their area of expertise.

Results: This paper presents 13 clusters of statements on prophylaxis and treatment of mucositis that achieved consensus.

Conclusions: OM represents a very stressful situation for head and neck cancer patients submitted to chemo-radiation or exclusive radiation treatment. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory, but there is still no gold-standard protocol that is prominently better than others.

Keywords: Chemoradiation; Chemotherapy; Clinical management; Head and neck cancer; Mucositis; Oral mucositis; Radiation therapy; Radiotherapy; Supportive care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms