Risk of Contamination in Assembled vs Disassembled Instruments in Hip Arthroplasty Surgery
- PMID: 26948131
- PMCID: PMC5922437
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.004
Risk of Contamination in Assembled vs Disassembled Instruments in Hip Arthroplasty Surgery
Abstract
Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most common causes of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and associated with higher costs, prolonged pain, and worse clinical outcomes. Many factors have been linked to increased infection rates, one being the operative equipment and instrumentation used during the surgical procedure. With few arthroplasty instruments designed for complete disassembly and increasingly complex instrument designs, this study seeks to understand the effect that instrument disassembly plays on infection using disassembled and assembled standard femoral broach handles (BHs).
Methods: Two BHs, not designed for disassembly, were modified and then contaminated in the disassembled state with Geobacillus stearothermophilus vegetative-form bacteria and spores. Using both flash and standard sterilization cycles, the BHs were steam sterilized in the disassembled or assembled state and then analyzed for remaining bacteria and spores.
Results: At all target locations after either a flash sterilization cycle or a standard sterilization cycle, complete eradication of both the vegetative-form and spore-form of G stearothermophilus was achieved.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that adequate decontamination of the tested BHs can be achieved after steam sterilization in either the disassembled or assembled state, without an increased risk of infection transmission.
Keywords: contamination; disassembled; instrumentation; periprosthetic joint infection; sterility; total hip arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
One or more of the authors of this paper have disclosed potential or pertinent conflicts of interest, which may include receipt of payment, either direct or indirect, institutional support, or association with an entity in the biomedical field which may be perceived to have potential conflict of interest with this work. For full disclosure statements refer to
Figures
References
-
- Kurtz SM, Lau E, Schmier J, et al. Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(7):984. - PubMed
-
- Lopez-Contreras J, Limon E, Matas L, et al. Epidemiology of surgical site infections after total hip and knee joint replacement during 2007-2009: a report from the VINCat Program. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2012;30(Suppl 3):26. - PubMed
-
- Kurtz SM, Lau E, Watson H, et al. Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(8 Suppl):61. - PubMed
-
- Bozic KJ, Ries MD. The impact of infection after total hip arthroplasty on hospital and surgeon resource utilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(8):1746. - PubMed
-
- Klouche S, Sariali E, Mamoudy P. Total hip arthroplasty revision due to infection: a cost analysis approach. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96(2):124. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
