Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Jun;105(6):1575-1583.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.020. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

Predictors of pregnancy and live-birth in couples with unexplained infertility after ovarian stimulation-intrauterine insemination

Karl R Hansen  1 , Amy Linnea W He  2 , Aaron K Styer  3 , Robert A Wild  4 , Samantha Butts  5 , Lawrence Engmann  6 , Michael P Diamond  7 , Richard S Legro  8 , Christos Coutifaris  5 , Ruben Alvero  9 , Randal D Robinson  10 , Peter Casson  11 , Gregory M Christman  12 , Hao Huang  2 , Nanette Santoro  9 , Esther Eisenberg  13 , Heping Zhang  2 ; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Reproductive Medicine Network
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Predictors of pregnancy and live-birth in couples with unexplained infertility after ovarian stimulation-intrauterine insemination

Karl R Hansen et al. Fertil Steril. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To identify baseline characteristics of couples that are likely to predict conception, clinical pregnancy, and live birth after up to four cycles of ovarian stimulation with IUI in couples with unexplained infertility.

Design: Secondary analyses of data from a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial investigating pregnancy, live birth, and multiple pregnancy rates after ovarian stimulation-IUI with clomiphene citrate, letrozole, or gonadotropins.

Setting: Outpatient clinical units.

Patient(s): Nine-hundred couples with unexplained infertility who participated in the Assessment of Multiple Intrauterine Gestations from Ovarian Stimulation clinical trial.

Intervention(s): As part of the clinical trial, treatment was randomized equally to one of three arms and continued for up to four cycles or until pregnancy was achieved.

Main outcome measure(s): Conception, clinical pregnancy, and live-birth rates.

Result(s): In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, after adjustment for other covariates, age, waist circumference, income level, duration of infertility, and a history of prior pregnancy loss were significantly associated with at least one pregnancy outcome. Other baseline demographic and lifestyle characteristics including smoking, alcohol use, and serum levels of antimüllerian hormone were not significantly associated with pregnancy outcomes.

Conclusion(s): While age and duration of infertility were significant predictors of all pregnancy outcomes, many other baseline characteristics were not. The identification of level of income as a significant predictor of outcomes independent of race and education may reflect differences in the underlying etiologies of unexplained infertility or could reveal disparities in access to fertility and/or obstetrical care.

Clinical trial registration: NCT01044862.

Keywords: Unexplained infertility; intrauterine insemination; ovarian stimulation; predictors; pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC) for the final models for conception, pregnancy, and live-birth
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Stephen EH, Chandra A. Updated projections of infertility in the United States: 1995–2025. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(1):30–34. - PubMed
    1. Downey J, Yingling S, McKinney M, Husami N, Jewelewicz R, Maidman J. Mood disorders, psychiatric symptoms, and distress in women presenting for infertility evaluation. Fertil Steril. 1989;52(3):425–432. - PubMed
    1. Whiteford LM, Gonzalez L. Stigma: the hidden burden of infertility. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40(1):27–36. - PubMed
    1. Guzick DS, Grefenstette I, Baffone K, Berga SL, Krasnow JS, Stovall DW, et al. Infertility evaluation in fertile women: a model for assessing the efficacy of infertility testing. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(12):2306–2310. - PubMed
    1. Collins JA, Corsignani PG. Unexplained infertility: a review of diagnosis, prognosis, treatment efficacy and management. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1992;39(4):267–275. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data