Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;23(2):131-5.
doi: 10.3109/09286586.2016.1145241. Epub 2016 Mar 7.

Inter-Eye Agreement in Measurement of Retinal Vascular Fractal Dimension in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Affiliations

Inter-Eye Agreement in Measurement of Retinal Vascular Fractal Dimension in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Knud B Pedersen et al. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2016.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate inter-eye agreement in retinal vascular fractal dimension (FD) in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study, both eyes were exained in 178 patients with type 1 diabetes. All vessels in a zone 0.5-2.0 disc diameters from the optic disc were traced and FD calculated with the box-counting method using SIVA-Fractal semiautomatic software. The modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale was used to grade diabetic retinopathy (DR). Pitman's test of difference in variance was used to calculated inter-eye agreement in FD according to level of DR.

Results: Mean age and duration of diabetes was 37.0 years and 29.5 years, respectively, and 49.4% of participants were male. Mean FD of right and left eyes was 1.4540 and 1.4472, respectively. FD did not differ between eyes in patients with no or non-proliferative DR (NPDR) in both eyes. This was true for patients with the same level of DR in both eyes (n = 74, p = 0.73), as well as for patients in which the ETDRS level of DR between the eyes differed by 1 (n = 43, p = 0.99) or more (n = 9, p = 0.53). In patients treated for proliferative DR in one eye, FD was significantly lower in this eye compared to the other (n = 10, p = 0.03).

Conclusion: FD did not differ significantly between the two eyes of patients with no DR or NPDR, despite differences in severity of DR.

Keywords: Agreement; correlation; diabetic retinopathy; fractals; retinal vascular fractal dimension; type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources