Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Jan;101(1):122-130.
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001084.

Outcomes From Pancreatic Transplantation in Donation After Cardiac Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Outcomes From Pancreatic Transplantation in Donation After Cardiac Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sara Shahrestani et al. Transplantation. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Pancreas transplantation remains the gold standard for treatment for type I diabetes providing an insulin-independent, normoglycemic state. Increasingly, donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors are used in view of the organ donor shortage. We aimed to systematically review recipient outcomes from DCD donors and where possible compared these with donor after brain death (DBD) donors.

Methods: We searched the databases MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library from inception to March 2015, for studies reporting the outcome of DCD pancreas transplants. We appraised studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and meta-analyzed using a random effects model.

Results: We identified 18 studies, 4 retrospective and 6 prospective cohort studies and 8 case reports. Our bias assessment revealed that although studies were well conducted, some studies had potential confounding factors and absence of comparator groups. Eight of the 18 studies included a DBD comparison group comprising 23 609 transplant recipients. Importantly, there was no significant difference in allograft survival up to 10 years (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.74-1.31; P = 0.92), or patient survival (hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.62-2.78; P = 0.47) between DCD and DBD pancreas transplants. We estimated that the odds of graft thrombosis was 1.67 times higher in DCD organs (95% CI, 1.04-2.67; P = 0.006). However, subgroup analysis found thrombosis was not higher in recipients whose DCD donors were given antemortem heparin (P = 0.62).

Conclusions: Using current DCD criteria, pancreas transplantation is a viable alternative to DBD transplantation, and antemortem interventions including heparinization may be beneficial. This potential benefit of DCD pancreas donation warrants further study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • DCD Pancreas Transplantation Meta-Analysis: Ethical and Technical Considerations.
    Rathnasamy Muthusamy AS, Friend PJ, Dor FJ, Crane JS, Papalois V, Herbert P, Sinha S. Rathnasamy Muthusamy AS, et al. Transplantation. 2017 Feb;101(2):e57. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001560. Transplantation. 2017. PMID: 27820782 No abstract available.
  • The Authors' Reply.
    Shahrestani S, Robertson P, Pleass HC, Hawthorne WJ. Shahrestani S, et al. Transplantation. 2017 Feb;101(2):e58. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001561. Transplantation. 2017. PMID: 28118318 No abstract available.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources