Effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening: a reanalysis of United States assisted reproductive technology data 2011-2012
- PMID: 26952783
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.026
Effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening: a reanalysis of United States assisted reproductive technology data 2011-2012
Abstract
Objective: To assess effectiveness of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) in fresh IVF cycles.
Design: Reanalysis of retrospective US national data.
Setting: Not applicable.
Patient(s): A total of 5,471 fresh autologous IVF cycles with PGS and 97,069 cycles without PGS, reported in 2011-2012 to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Intervention(s): Not applicable.
Main outcome measure(s): Cycles that reached ET, miscarriage rates, live birth rates per cycle and per transfer.
Result(s): More PGS than non-PGS cycles reached ET (64.2% vs. 62.3%), suggesting favorable patient selection bias for patients using PGS. Nevertheless, live births rates per cycle start (25.2% vs. 28.8%) and per ET (39.3% vs. 46.2%) were significantly better in non-PGS cycles, whereas miscarriage rates were similar (13.7% vs. 13.9%). With a maternal age >37 years significantly more cycles in the PGS group reached ET (53.1% vs. 41.9%), suggesting a significant selection bias for more favorable patients in the PGS population. This bias rather than the PGS procedure may partially explain the observed improved live birth rate per cycle (17.7% vs. 12.7%) and lower miscarriage rate (16.8% vs. 26.0%) in the older PGS group.
Conclusion(s): Overall, PGS decreased chances of live birth in association with IVF. National improvements in live birth and miscarriage rates reported with PGS in older women are likely the consequence of favorable patient selection biases.
Keywords: In vitro fertilization; aneuploidy; embryo selection; preimplantation genetic diagnosis; preimplantation genetic screening.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Preimplantation genetic screening 2.0: an evolving and promising technique.Fertil Steril. 2016 Jul;106(1):64-65. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 24. Fertil Steril. 2016. PMID: 27233759 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Is the hypothesis of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) still supportable? A review.J Ovarian Res. 2017 Mar 27;10(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13048-017-0318-3. J Ovarian Res. 2017. PMID: 28347334 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Preimplantation genetic screening: who benefits?Fertil Steril. 2016 Sep 1;106(3):597-602. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.04.027. Epub 2016 Apr 30. Fertil Steril. 2016. PMID: 27143516
-
Next generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic screening improves pregnancy outcomes compared with array comparative genomic hybridization in single thawed euploid embryo transfer cycles.Fertil Steril. 2018 Apr;109(4):627-632. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.017. Epub 2018 Mar 28. Fertil Steril. 2018. PMID: 29605407
-
Outcomes of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an analysis of the United States Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance Data, 2011-2012.Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):394-400. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Nov 6. Fertil Steril. 2016. PMID: 26551441 Free PMC article.
-
Recent advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 Sep;33(9):1129-34. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0750-0. Epub 2016 Jun 7. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016. PMID: 27272212 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Is the hypothesis of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) still supportable? A review.J Ovarian Res. 2017 Mar 27;10(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13048-017-0318-3. J Ovarian Res. 2017. PMID: 28347334 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and chromosomal structural rearrangement: A summary of a nationwide study by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.Reprod Med Biol. 2023 May 31;22(1):e12518. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12518. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Reprod Med Biol. 2023. PMID: 37274391 Free PMC article.
-
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in patients of different age: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024 Jul;67(4):356-379. doi: 10.5468/ogs.24028. Epub 2024 May 28. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38803301 Free PMC article.
-
Less-invasive chromosome screening of embryos and embryo assessment by genetic studies of DNA in embryo culture medium.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Dec;36(12):2505-2513. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01603-w. Epub 2019 Nov 15. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019. PMID: 31728811 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the Impact of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation and Non-Invasive Oocyte Assessment in ART Treatments.Life (Basel). 2023 Sep 29;13(10):1989. doi: 10.3390/life13101989. Life (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37895371 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical