Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Mar;35(3):480-8.
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0528.

Older, Less Regulated Medical Marijuana Programs Have Much Greater Enrollment Rates Than Newer 'Medicalized' Programs

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Older, Less Regulated Medical Marijuana Programs Have Much Greater Enrollment Rates Than Newer 'Medicalized' Programs

Arthur Robin Williams et al. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia have passed laws implementing medical marijuana programs. The nineteen programs that were in operation as of October 2014 collectively had over one million participants. All states (including D.C.) with medical marijuana laws require physicians directly or indirectly to authorize the use of marijuana at their discretion, yet little is known about how medical marijuana programs vary regarding adherence to basic principles of medical practice and associated rates of enrollment. To explore this, we analyzed marijuana programs according to seven components of traditional medical care and pharmaceutical regulation. We then examined enrollment rates, while controlling for potentially confounding state characteristics. We found that fourteen of the twenty-four programs were nonmedical and collectively enrolled 99.4 percent of participants nationwide, with enrollment rates twenty times greater than programs deemed to be "medicalized." Policy makers implementing or amending medical marijuana programs should consider the powerful relationship between less regulation and greater enrollment. Researchers should consider variations across programs when assessing programs' population-level effects.

Keywords: Mental Health/Substance Abuse; Pharmaceuticals; Physicians; Public Opinion; State/Local Issues.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Exhibit 3
Exhibit 3. Enrollment and medical orientation scores in state medical marijuana programs
Source Authors' analysis of information on 19 state medical marijuana programs in operation as of October 27, 2014.
Exhibit 4
Exhibit 4. Enrollment in state medical marijuana programs and presence of four program components
Source Authors' analysis of information on 19 state medical marijuana programs in operation as of October 27, 2014. Notes The components are described in Exhibit 1. Each of the first three components were included in nineteen programs; thirty-day supply limits were included in sixteen programs.

References

    1. ProCon.org. Number of legal medical marijuana patients (as of Oct 27, 2014 [Internet] Santa Monica (CA): ProCon; [cited 2016 Jan 8]. last updated 2015 Apr 27. Available from: http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=005889.
    1. Hoffmann DE, Weber E. Medical marijuana and the law. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(16):1453–7. - PubMed
    1. Pacula RL, Sevigny EL. Marijauna liberalization policies: why we can't learn much from policy still in motion. J Policy Anal Manage. 2014;33(1):212–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pacula RL, Hunt P, Boustead A. Words can be deceiving: a review of variation among legally effective medical marijuana laws in the United States. J Drug Policy Anal. 2014;7(1):1–19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilkinson ST, D'Souza DC. Problems with the medicalization of marijuana. JAMA. 2014;311(23):2377–8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources