Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients, Subsequent Use in Primary Care, and Physicians' Opinions About Acid-Suppressive Therapy
- PMID: 26954653
- DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000433
Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients, Subsequent Use in Primary Care, and Physicians' Opinions About Acid-Suppressive Therapy
Abstract
Objectives: Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is not indicated in most hospitalized patients. This study determined the prevalence of the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and histamine receptor 2 blockers (H2B) in hospitalized patients, continued PPI/H2B use after discharge, and physicians' opinions about SUP.
Methods: A retrospective electronic chart review, as well as a national survey of residents and faculty in primary care residency programs to determine the appropriateness of SUP.
Results: Of 753 charts reviewed, 332 hospitalized patients with outpatient follow-up were included; 303 of them had either PPI or H2B ordered during hospitalization, but only 120 patients had an indication for SUP. Stepwise logistic regression results showed patients with a history of PPI/H2B use were 16.6 times more likely to receive SUP (odds ratio 16.6; 95% confidence interval 2.2-124.7). In addition, a PPI/H2B indication also significantly predicted SUP use (odds ratio 5.1; 95% confidence interval 1.2-22.2). A total of 171 completed surveys were received: 73% residents and 27% faculty. Only 24% reported being aware of SUP guidelines; 17% reported using electronic health record order set suggestions for SUP.
Conclusions: More than 90% of hospitalized patients received SUP; less than half of them had an indication for needing SUP. A large number of patients discharged on PPI/H2B continued to receive it in the outpatient setting at 6 months follow-up. Only 24% of physicians reported using SUP based on guidelines. Physician education and evidence-based validation of electronic health record order sets are potential areas for improvement.
Comment in
-
Commentary on "Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients, Subsequent Use in Primary Care and Physicians' Opinions About Acid-Suppressive Therapy".South Med J. 2016 Mar;109(3):165-6. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000429. South Med J. 2016. PMID: 26954654 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Commentary on "Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients, Subsequent Use in Primary Care and Physicians' Opinions About Acid-Suppressive Therapy".South Med J. 2016 Mar;109(3):165-6. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000429. South Med J. 2016. PMID: 26954654 No abstract available.
-
Impact of pharmacy intervention on the use of proton-pump inhibitors in the hospital setting.Consult Pharm. 2013 Dec;28(12):786-92. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2013.786. Consult Pharm. 2013. PMID: 24322962
-
Why do physicians prescribe stress ulcer prophylaxis to general medicine patients?South Med J. 2010 Nov;103(11):1103-10. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181f6539d. South Med J. 2010. PMID: 21042168
-
Stress ulcer prophylaxis in hospitalized patients not in intensive care units.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Jul 1;64(13):1396-400. doi: 10.2146/ajhp060393. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007. PMID: 17592004 Review.
-
Proton pump inhibitors: are they overutilised in clinical practice and do they pose significant risk?Int J Clin Pract. 2012 Jun;66(6):582-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2012.02921.x. Int J Clin Pract. 2012. PMID: 22607510 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of pharmacy-supported interventions on proportion of patients receiving non-indicated acid suppressive therapy upon discharge: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0243134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243134. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33270710 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical