Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jan 2;7(1):1-11.
doi: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1151989.

Innovative farmers and regulatory gatekeepers: Genetically modified crops regulation and adoption in developing countries

Affiliations
Review

Innovative farmers and regulatory gatekeepers: Genetically modified crops regulation and adoption in developing countries

Woldeyesus Sinebo et al. GM Crops Food. .

Abstract

The regulation of genetically modified (GM) crops is a topical issue in agriculture and environment over the past 2 decades. The objective of this paper is to recount regulatory and adoption practices in some developing countries that have successfully adopted GM crops so that aspiring countries may draw useful lessons and best practices for their biosafatey regulatory regimes. The first 11 mega-GM crops growing countries each with an area of more than one million hectares in 2014 were examined. Only five out of the 11 countries had smooth and orderly adoption of these crops as per the regulatory requirement of each country. In the remaining 6 countries (all developing countries), GM crops were either introduced across borders without official authorization, released prior to regulatory approval or unapproved seeds were sold along with the approved ones in violation to the existing regulations. Rapid expansion of transgenic crops over the past 2 decades in the developing world was a result of an intense desire by farmers to adopt these crops irrespective of regulatory roadblocks. Lack of workable biosafety regulatory system and political will to support GM crops encouraged unauthorized access to GM crop varieties. In certain cases, unregulated access in turn appeared to result in the adoption of substandard or spurious technology which undermined performance and productivity. An optimal interaction among the national agricultural innovation systems, biosafety regulatory bodies, biotech companies and high level policy makers is vital in making a workable regulated progress in the adoption of GM crops. Factoring forgone opportunities to farmers to benefit from GM crops arising from overregulation into biosafety risk analysis and decision making is suggested. Building functional biosafety regulatory systems that balances the needs of farmers to access and utilize the GM technology with the regulatory imperatives to ensure adequate safety to the environment and human health is recommended.

Keywords: GM crops adoption history; biosafety regulation; functional biosafety systems; unauthorized release.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Actors in the agricultural biotechnology innovation systems macrocosm.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Policies driving the adoption of genetically modified crops in the developing world (Note: Circles and text were superimposed on a modified GM crop map from Clive James [James, 2012]).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barton K.A., and Brill W.J.. Prospects in plant genetic engineering. Science 1983; 219:671-676; PMID:6297007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.6297007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berg P., Baltimore D., Boyer H.W., Cohen S.N., Davis R.W., Hogness D.S., Nathans D., Roblin R., Watson J.D., Weissman S., and Zinder N.D.. Potential biohazards of recombinant DNA molecules. Science 1974; 185:303; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4148.303 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berg P., Baltimore D., Brenner S., Roblin R.O., and Singer M.F.. Asilomar Conference on Recombinant DNA Molecules. Science 1975; 18:991-994; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1056638 - DOI - PubMed
    1. CBD (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity) Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity: text and annexes Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2000. Available from: https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cartagena-protocol-en.pdf
    1. CBD (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity) The Nagoya - Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: 2011. Available from: https://bch.cbd.int/protocol/supplementary/

LinkOut - more resources