Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun;2(2):97-103.
doi: 10.1515/dx-2014-0069. Epub 2015 Mar 12.

The challenges in defining and measuring diagnostic error

Affiliations

The challenges in defining and measuring diagnostic error

Laura Zwaan et al. Diagnosis (Berl). 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Diagnostic errors have emerged as a serious patient safety problem but they are hard to detect and complex to define. At the research summit of the 2013 Diagnostic Error in Medicine 6th International Conference, we convened a multidisciplinary expert panel to discuss challenges in defining and measuring diagnostic errors in real-world settings. In this paper, we synthesize these discussions and outline key research challenges in operationalizing the definition and measurement of diagnostic error. Some of these challenges include 1) difficulties in determining error when the disease or diagnosis is evolving over time and in different care settings, 2) accounting for a balance between underdiagnosis and overaggressive diagnostic pursuits, and 3) determining disease diagnosis likelihood and severity in hindsight. We also build on these discussions to describe how some of these challenges can be addressed while conducting research on measuring diagnostic error.

Keywords: clinical decision-making; cognitive errors; diagnostic error; judgment; patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An overview of disease evolution, diagnostic process evolution and outcomes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Berner ES, Graber ML. Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. Am J Med. 2008;121(Suppl 5):S2–23. - PubMed
    1. Zwaan L, De Bruijne MC, Wagner C, Thijs A, Smits M, Van der Wal G, et al. Patient record review on the incidence, consequences and causes of diagnostic adverse events. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1015–21. - PubMed
    1. Zwaan L, Thijs A, Wagner C, Van der Wal G, Timmermans D. Relating faults in diagnostic reasoning with diagnostic errors and patient harm. Acad Med. 2012;87:149–56. - PubMed
    1. Newman-Toker D, Pronovost P. Diagnostic errors – the next frontier for patient safety. J Am Med Assoc. 2009;301:1062–2. - PubMed
    1. Graber M, Plebani M. Diagnosis: a new era, a new journal. Diagnosis. 2014;1:1–2. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources