Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 9:9:150.
doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1962-1.

Computer vision syndrome among computer office workers in a developing country: an evaluation of prevalence and risk factors

Affiliations

Computer vision syndrome among computer office workers in a developing country: an evaluation of prevalence and risk factors

P Ranasinghe et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Background: Computer vision syndrome (CVS) is a group of visual symptoms experienced in relation to the use of computers. Nearly 60 million people suffer from CVS globally, resulting in reduced productivity at work and reduced quality of life of the computer worker. The present study aims to describe the prevalence of CVS and its associated factors among a nationally-representative sample of Sri Lankan computer workers.

Methods: Two thousand five hundred computer office workers were invited for the study from all nine provinces of Sri Lanka between May and December 2009. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect socio-demographic data, symptoms of CVS and its associated factors. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed in all patients with 'presence of CVS' as the dichotomous dependent variable and age, gender, duration of occupation, daily computer usage, pre-existing eye disease, not using a visual display terminal (VDT) filter, adjusting brightness of screen, use of contact lenses, angle of gaze and ergonomic practices knowledge as the continuous/dichotomous independent variables. A similar binary logistic regression analysis was performed in all patients with 'severity of CVS' as the dichotomous dependent variable and other continuous/dichotomous independent variables.

Results: Sample size was 2210 (response rate-88.4%). Mean age was 30.8 ± 8.1 years and 50.8% of the sample were males. The 1-year prevalence of CVS in the study population was 67.4%. Female gender (OR: 1.28), duration of occupation (OR: 1.07), daily computer usage (1.10), pre-existing eye disease (OR: 4.49), not using a VDT filter (OR: 1.02), use of contact lenses (OR: 3.21) and ergonomics practices knowledge (OR: 1.24) all were associated with significantly presence of CVS. The duration of occupation (OR: 1.04) and presence of pre-existing eye disease (OR: 1.54) were significantly associated with the presence of 'severe CVS'.

Conclusions: Sri Lankan computer workers had a high prevalence of CVS. Female gender, longer duration of occupation, higher daily computer usage, pre-existing eye disease, not using a VDT filter, use of contact lenses and higher ergonomics practices knowledge all were associated with significantly with the presence of CVS. The factors associated with the severity of CVS were the duration of occupation and presence of pre-existing eye disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Angle of gaze

References

    1. American Optometric Association . Guide to the clinical aspects of computer vision syndrome. St. Louis: American Optometric Association; 1995.
    1. Gangamma M, Rajagopala M. A clinical study on” computer vision syndrome” and its management with Triphala eye drops and Saptamrita Lauha. AYU. 2010;31(2):236. doi: 10.4103/0974-8520.72407. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sen A, Richardson S. A study of computer-related upper limb discomfort and computer vision syndrome. J Hum Ergol. 2007;36(2):45–50. - PubMed
    1. Thomson WD. Eye problems and visual display terminals—the facts and the fallacies. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1998;18(2):111–119. doi: 10.1016/S0275-5408(97)00067-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klamm J, Tarnow KG. Computer vision syndrome: a review of literature. Medsurg Nurs. 2015;24(2):89–93. - PubMed