Comparison of Immediate With Delayed Stenting Using the Minimalist Immediate Mechanical Intervention Approach in Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The MIMI Study
- PMID: 26957418
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003388
Comparison of Immediate With Delayed Stenting Using the Minimalist Immediate Mechanical Intervention Approach in Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The MIMI Study
Abstract
Background: Delayed stent implantation after restoration of normal epicardial flow by a minimalist immediate mechanical intervention aims to decrease the rate of distal embolization and impaired myocardial reperfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention. We sought to confirm whether a delayed stenting (DS) approach (24-48 hours) improves myocardial reperfusion, versus immediate stenting, in patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Methods and results: In the prospective, randomized, open-label minimalist immediate mechanical intervention (MIMI) trial, patients (n=140) with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction ≤12 hours were randomized to immediate stenting (n=73) or DS (n=67) after Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 3 flow restoration by thrombus aspiration. Patients in the DS group underwent a second coronary arteriography for stent implantation a median of 36 hours (interquartile range 29-46) after randomization. The primary end point was microvascular obstruction (% left ventricular mass) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging performed 5 days (interquartile range 4-6) after the first procedure. There was a nonsignificant trend toward lower microvascular obstruction in the immediate stenting group compared with DS group (1.88% versus 3.96%; P=0.051), which became significant after adjustment for the area at risk (P=0.049). Median infarct weight, left ventricular ejection fraction, and infarct size did not differ between groups. No difference in 6-month outcomes was apparent for the rate of major cardiovascular and cerebral events.
Conclusions: The present findings do not support a strategy of DS versus immediate stenting in patients with ST-segment-elevation infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and even suggested a deleterious effect of DS on microvascular obstruction size.
Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01360242.
Keywords: ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction; infarction; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention; stent.
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.
Comment in
-
Minimalist immediate mechanical intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: is it time to redefine targets?Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Feb;7(1):4-10. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2016.11.03. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017. PMID: 28164007 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy (CDT) Editorial: the Minimalist Immediate Mechanical Intervention study.Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Jun;7(Suppl 2):S73-S76. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.01.13. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017. PMID: 28748152 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical