Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 9;11(3):e0150645.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150645. eCollection 2016.

How Different Medical School Selection Processes Call upon Different Personality Characteristics

Nienke R Schripsema  1 , Anke M van Trigt  2 , Martha A van der Wal  1 , Janke Cohen-Schotanus  2
Affiliations

How Different Medical School Selection Processes Call upon Different Personality Characteristics

Nienke R Schripsema et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Research indicates that certain personality traits relate to performance in the medical profession. Yet, personality testing during selection seems ineffective. In this study, we examine the extent to which different medical school selection processes call upon desirable personality characteristics in applicants.

Methods: 1019 of all 1055 students who entered the Dutch Bachelor of Medicine at University of Groningen, the Netherlands in 2009, 2010 and 2011 were included in this study. Students were admitted based on either top pre-university grades (n = 139), acceptance in a voluntary multifaceted selection process (n = 286), or lottery weighted for pre-university GPA. Within the lottery group, we distinguished between students who had not participated (n = 284) and students who were initially rejected (n = 310) in the voluntary selection process. Two months after admission, personality was assessed with the NEO-FFI, a measure of the five factor model of personality. We performed ANCOVA modelling with gender as a covariate to examine personality differences between the four groups.

Results: The multifaceted selection group scored higher on extraversion than all other groups(p<0.01), higher on conscientiousness than both lottery-admitted groups(p<0.01), and lower on neuroticism than the lottery-admitted group that had not participated in the voluntary selection process. The latter group scored lower on conscientiousness than all other groups(p<0.05) and lower on agreeableness than the multifaceted selection group and the top pre-university group(p<0.01).

Conclusions: Differences between the four admission groups, though statistically significant, were relatively small. Personality scores in the group admitted through the voluntary multifaceted selection process seemed most fit for the medical profession. Personality scores in the lottery-admitted group that had not participated in this process seemed least fit for the medical profession. It seems that in order to select applicants with suitable personalities, an admission process that calls upon desirable personality characteristics is beneficial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Griffin B, Wilson IG. Faking good: self-enhancement in medical school applicants. Med Educ. 2012;46(5):485–490. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04208.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Powis D. Personality testing in the context of selecting health professionals. Med Teach. 2009;31(12):1045–1046. 10.3109/01421590903390601 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Board of Internal Medicine. Project Professionalism. 1995.
    1. General Medical Council. Good medical practice. 2013.
    1. Doherty EM, Nugent E. Personality factors and medical training: a review of the literature. Med Educ. 2011;45(2):132–140. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03760.x - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources