Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015;31(6):434-41.
doi: 10.1017/S0266462315000677.

REVIEWING TRANSFERABILITY IN ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS ORIGINATING FROM EASTERN EUROPE

Olena Mandrik  1 , Saskia Knies  2 , Zoltan Kalo  3 , Johan L Severens  4
Affiliations
Review

REVIEWING TRANSFERABILITY IN ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS ORIGINATING FROM EASTERN EUROPE

Olena Mandrik et al. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to analyze the quality and transferability issues reported in published peer-reviewed English-language economic evaluations based in healthcare settings of the Central and Eastern European (CEE) and former Soviet countries.

Methods: A systematic search of economic evaluations of healthcare interventions was performed for Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bulgaria, Estonia, Georgia, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Lithuania, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Republic of Moldova, Romania, the Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovenia, and Ukraine. The included studies were assessed according to their characteristics, quality (using Drummond's checklist), use of local data, and the transferability of inputs and results, if addressed.

Results: Most of the thirty-four economic evaluations identified were conducted from a healthcare or payer perspective (74 percent), with 47 percent of studies focusing on infectious diseases. The least frequently and transparently addressed parameters were the items' stated perspectives, relevant costs included, accurately measured costs in appropriate units, outcomes and costs credibly valued, and uncertainties addressed. Local data were often used to assess unit costs, baseline risk, and resource usage, while jurisdiction-specific utilities were included in only one study. Only 32 percent of relevant studies discussed the limitations of using foreign data, and 36 percent of studies discussed the transferability of their own study results to other jurisdictions.

Conclusions: Transferability of the results is not sufficiently discussed in published economic evaluations. To simplify the transferability of studies to other jurisdictions, the following should be comprehensively addressed: uncertainty, impact of influential parameters, and data transferability. The transparency of reporting should be improved.

Keywords: Cost effectiveness; Developing countries; Review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart outlining paper selection process for the systematic review.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bingefors K, Pashos PC, Smith MD, Berger ML. Health care cost, quality, and outcomes: ISPOR book of terms. Lawrenceville, NJ: International Society for Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research; 2003.
    1. Dankó D. Health technology assessment in middle-income countries: Recommendations for a balanced assessment system. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2014;2:1–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drummond M, Brown R, Fendrick AM, et al. Use of pharmacoeconomics information — Report of the ISPOR Task Force on use of pharmacoeconomic/health economic information in health-care decision making. Value Health. 2003;6:407–416. - PubMed
    1. The World Bank. Middle income countries overview; 2011. http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/mic/overview (accessed May 17, 2014).
    1. Kolasa K, Kalo Z, Zah V, Dolezal T. Role of health technology assessment in the process of implementation of the EU Transparency Directive: Relevant experience from Central Eastern European countries. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;12:283–287. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms