Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;95(10):e3080.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003080.

Does Orthodontic Treatment Affect the Alveolar Bone Density?

Affiliations

Does Orthodontic Treatment Affect the Alveolar Bone Density?

Jian-Hong Yu et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Few studies involving human participants have been conducted to investigate the effect of orthodontic treatment on alveolar bone density around the teeth. Our previous study revealed that patients who received 6 months of active orthodontic treatment exhibited an ∼24% decrease in alveolar bone density around the teeth. However, after an extensive retention period following orthodontic treatment, whether the bone density around the teeth can recover to its original state from before the treatment remains unclear, thus warranting further investigation.The purpose of this study was to assess the bone density changes around the teeth before, during, and after orthodontic treatment.Dental cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to measure the changes in bone density around 6 teeth in the anterior maxilla (maxilla central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines) of 8 patients before and after orthodontic treatment. Each patient underwent 3 dental CBCT scans: before treatment (T0); at the end of 7 months of active orthodontic treatment (T1); after several months (20-22 months) of retention (T2). The Friedman test was applied to evaluate the changes in the alveolar bone density around the teeth according to the 3 dental CBCT scans.From T0 to T1, a significant reduction in bone density was observed around the teeth (23.36 ± 10.33%); by contrast, a significant increase was observed from T1 to T2 (31.81 ± 23.80%). From the perspective of the overall orthodontic treatment, comparing the T0 and T2 scans revealed that the bone density around the teeth was relatively constant (a reduction of only 0.75 ± 19.85%). The results of the statistical test also confirmed that the difference in bone density between T0 and T2 was nonsignificant.During orthodontic tooth movement, the alveolar bone density around the teeth was reduced. However, after a period of bone recovery, the reduced bone density recovered to its previous state from before the orthodontic treatment. However, the bone density around ∼10% of the teeth in this region could not recover to 80% of its state from before the orthodontic treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic of the 3 levels at which the root of the upper right lateral incisor and surrounding bone were cross sectioned. CEJ = cementoenamel junction (the figure was adapted from our previous study).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Bone-density measurement around the upper right incisor in the intermediate slice of Patient 5: (upper left) schematic occlusal view of the maxilla; (lower left) schematic of the middle slice of the intermediate portion of the upper right incisor; (A) segment the area of the tooth from the CBCT image according to the threshold value of the cementum; (B) expand the area by 1 voxel to include the PDL; (C) expand the area by a further 3 voxels to include the surrounding bone; (D) subtract the tooth and PDL from the combined tooth, PDL, and surrounding bone. The volumes of the areas of interest (mm3) and their densities (GV in the CBCT image) are also indicated (the figure was adapted from our previous study). CBCT = cone-beam computed tomography, GV = grayscale value, PDL = periodontal ligament.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Bone density changes around the 3 levels of each patient's teeth during orthodontic treatment (UL1 = upper left central incisor, UL2 = upper left lateral incisor, UL3 = upper left canine, UR1 = upper right central incisor, UR2 = upper right lateral incisor, UR3 = upper right canine). Left column: changes between T1 and T0, right column: changes between T2 and T0. (A) Patient 1; (B) Patient 2; (C) Patient 3; (D) Patient 4; (E) Patient 5; (F) Patient 6; (G) Patient 7; (H) Patient 8.
FIGURE 3 (Continued)
FIGURE 3 (Continued)
Bone density changes around the 3 levels of each patient's teeth during orthodontic treatment (UL1 = upper left central incisor, UL2 = upper left lateral incisor, UL3 = upper left canine, UR1 = upper right central incisor, UR2 = upper right lateral incisor, UR3 = upper right canine). Left column: changes between T1 and T0, right column: changes between T2 and T0. (A) Patient 1; (B) Patient 2; (C) Patient 3; (D) Patient 4; (E) Patient 5; (F) Patient 6; (G) Patient 7; (H) Patient 8.

References

    1. Chang HW, Huang HL, Yu JH, et al. Effects of orthodontic tooth movement on alveolar bone density. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16:679–688. - PubMed
    1. Sunnak R, Johal A, Fleming P. Is orthodontics prior to 11 years of age evidence-based? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015; 43:477–486. - PubMed
    1. Rischen RJ, Breuning KH, Bronkhorst EM, et al. Records needed for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning: a systematic review. PLoS One 2013; 8:e74186. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yu JH, Shu KW, Tsai MT, et al. A cone-beam computed tomography study of orthodontic apical root resorption. J Dent Sci 2013; 8:74–79.
    1. Banse X, Devogelaer JP. Does peripheral quantitative computed tomography ignore tissue density of cancellous bone? J Clin Densitom 2002; 5:403–410. - PubMed

Publication types