Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May;66(646):e337-46.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X684409. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

Investigating the public's use of Scotland's primary care telephone advice service (NHS 24): a population-based cross-sectional study

Anne McAteer  1 , Philip C Hannaford  2 , David Heaney  3 , Lewis D Ritchie  4 , Alison M Elliott  4
Affiliations

Investigating the public's use of Scotland's primary care telephone advice service (NHS 24): a population-based cross-sectional study

Anne McAteer et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2016 May.

Abstract

Background: There has been no comprehensive examination of the public's understanding of, and attitudes towards, NHS 24.

Aim: To investigate the public's use of NHS 24 and explore their understanding of, and beliefs about, the service.

Design and setting: Population-based cross-sectional study of adults in Scotland.

Method: Quantitative data were collected by self-completion postal questionnaire and qualitative data by follow-up telephone interviews.

Results: A corrected response rate of 34.1% (n = 1190) was obtained. More than half (51.0%, n = 601) of responders had used NHS 24. Callers were more likely to be female, have at least one child, and be aged 25-34 years. Most calls (92.4%, n = 549) were made out of hours, and 54.6% (n = 327) were made on behalf of someone else. The main reason for calling was to get advice about a new symptom (69.0%, n = 414). A total of 38.6% (n = 219) of users contacted another health professional following their call, mostly on NHS 24 advice (71.7%, n = 157). Over 80.0% (n = 449) of callers were satisfied with the service and 93.9% (n = 539) would use it again.Only 8.4% (n = 78) of responders had used the NHS 24 website and 4.6% (n = 53) the NHS inform service. The main reasons for non-use were not needing the service, a preference to see their own GP, and not knowing the telephone number. NHS 24 was mainly viewed as an out-of-hours alternative to the GP. It was not considered an appropriate service for minor symptoms. The main facilitator to use was convenience, whereas the main barrier to use was not knowing how and when to use the service.

Conclusion: Although most people who used NHS 24 were satisfied, others were unclear about how and when to use the service. Further education about the full range of services that NHS 24 offers should be considered.

Keywords: after-hours care; delivery of health care; health services research; interviews; primary health care; questionnaires.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. NHS 24 . NHS 24 summary report. Glasgow: NHS 24; 2001.
    1. NHS 24 Annual report and accounts 2012/2013. http://www.nhs24.com/aboutus/nhs24board/annualreportandaccounts/ (accessed 12 Feb 2016).
    1. Bunn F, Byrne G, Kendall S. The effects of telephone consultation and triage on healthcare use and patient satisfaction: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(521):956–961. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cook EJ, Randhawa G, Large S, et al. A U.K. case study of who uses NHS Direct: investigating the impact of age, gender, and deprivation on the utilization of NHS Direct. Telemed J E Health. 2012;18(9):693–698. - PubMed
    1. Shah SM, Cook DG. Socio-economic determinants of casualty and NHS Direct use. J Public Health. 2008;30(1):75–81. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources