Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 10;6(3):e010479.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010479.

Past speculations of the future: a review of the methods used for forecasting emerging health technologies

Lucy Doos  1 , Claire Packer  1 , Derek Ward  1 , Sue Simpson  1 , Andrew Stevens  2
Affiliations

Past speculations of the future: a review of the methods used for forecasting emerging health technologies

Lucy Doos et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Forecasting can support rational decision-making around the introduction and use of emerging health technologies and prevent investment in technologies that have limited long-term potential. However, forecasting methods need to be credible. We performed a systematic search to identify the methods used in forecasting studies to predict future health technologies within a 3-20-year timeframe. Identification and retrospective assessment of such methods potentially offer a route to more reliable prediction.

Design: Systematic search of the literature to identify studies reported on methods of forecasting in healthcare.

Participants: People are not needed in this study.

Data sources: The authors searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and grey literature sources, and included articles published in English that reported their methods and a list of identified technologies.

Main outcome measure: Studies reporting methods used to predict future health technologies within a 3-20-year timeframe with an identified list of individual healthcare technologies. Commercially sponsored reviews, long-term futurology studies (with over 20-year timeframes) and speculative editorials were excluded.

Results: 15 studies met our inclusion criteria. Our results showed that the majority of studies (13/15) consulted experts either alone or in combination with other methods such as literature searching. Only 2 studies used more complex forecasting tools such as scenario building.

Conclusions: The methodological fundamentals of formal 3-20-year prediction are consistent but vary in details. Further research needs to be conducted to ascertain if the predictions made were accurate and whether accuracy varies by the methods used or by the types of technologies identified.

Keywords: Forecasting; Systematic review; health technology; innovations; methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of article/report selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of forecasting methods used.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Henderson R. Technology innovation oversight and foresight. In: Garud R, ed. Chapter 9—on the dynamic of forecasting in technologically complex environment: the unexpectedly long old age of optical lithography. Cambridge University Press, 1997:147–66.
    1. Duow K, Vondeling H, Sørensen J et al. . The future should not take us by surprise: preparation of an early warning system in Denmark. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2004;20:342–50. - PubMed
    1. Postma TJBM, Alers JC, Terpstra S et al. . Medical technology decisions in The Netherlands: how to solve the dilemma of technology foresight versus market research? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 2007;74:1823–33. 10.1016/j.techfore.2007.05.011 - DOI
    1. Lerner JC, Robertson DC, Goldstein SM. Case studies on forecasting for innovative technologies: frequent revisions improve accuracy. Health Aff 2015;34:311–18. 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1066 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martin BR. Technology Foresight: capturing the benefits from science-related technologies. Res Eval 1996;6:158–68. 10.1093/rev/6.2.158 - DOI

Publication types