Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Mar 10:4:19.
doi: 10.1186/s40560-016-0144-5. eCollection 2016.

Profiles of direct oral anticoagulants and clinical usage-dosage and dose regimen differences

Affiliations
Review

Profiles of direct oral anticoagulants and clinical usage-dosage and dose regimen differences

Masahiro Ieko et al. J Intensive Care. .

Abstract

The availability of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has caused a paradigm shift in thrombosis management. DOAC profiles do not differ greatly, though they are quite different from that of warfarin, whereas their dosage and dose regimens are not consistent. The direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran seems to obstruct tenase by inhibiting thrombin generated in the initial phase and feedback to the amplification phase of cell-based coagulation reactions. Factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) mainly inhibit factor Xa activity of the prothrombinase complex in the propagation phase. The dose regimens of these inhibitors can be classified into once (rivaroxaban, edoxaban) and twice (dabigatran, apixaban) daily. On the other hand, their plasma elimination half-life times are similar, which can be explained by differences in the type of aimed anticoagulation, such as persistent (e.g., warfarin) and intermittent (e.g., low-molecular-weight heparin). Because of the differences among DOACs, an indicator is necessary to compare them. We investigated relative potency to compare dosage and intensity by calculation of conversion using a profile comprised of molecular weight, bioavailability, protein-binding rate, inhibitory constant, and dosage. We found that the relative potencies were different, with that of apixaban higher than edoxaban (60 mg) and nearly twice that of rivaroxaban. However, dabigatran could not be evaluated with this profile, likely due to its different mode of action. These results suggest that rivaroxaban and apixaban differ in regard to anticoagulation type, as the former shows persistent and the latter intermittent anticoagulation.

Keywords: Anticoagulant therapy; Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC); Relative potency; Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF); Warfarin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cell-based coagulation reaction. Tissue factor is revealed in endothelial cells or peripheral monocytes by physicochemical coagulation stimulation, resulting in the formation of a small amount of thrombin, initial thrombin (initial phase). Initial thrombin activates nearby platelets and coagulation factors. Tenase (X-ase) is then formed on the negative-charged phospholipid membrane of activated platelets, and FXa is converted from FX. FXa forms a prothrombinase complex on activated platelets, and thrombin is formed with that complex. This thrombin again activates platelets and coagulation factors (amplification phase), inducing the production of large amounts of FXa and thrombin (propagation phase), resulting in fibrin formation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Anticoagulation based on duration of action with consideration of half-life and dose regimen

References

    1. Harbrecht U. Old and new anticoagulants. Hämostaseologie. 2011;31:21–7. doi: 10.5482/ha-1149. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harder S. Novel oral anticoagulants: clinical pharmacology, indications and practical considerations. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;69:1617–33. doi: 10.1007/s00228-013-1510-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoffman M, Monroe DM, Roberts HR. Cellular interaction in hemostasis. Haemostasis. 1996;26(Supple):12–6. - PubMed
    1. Eriksson BI, Dahl OE, Rosencher N, Kurth AA, Vandij CN, Frostick SP, et al. Oral dabigatran etexilate vs. subcutaneous enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee replacement: the RE-MODEL randomized trial. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5:2178–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02748.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The RE-MOBILIZE Writing Committee Oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate vs North American Enoxaparin Regimen for prevention of venous thromboembolism after knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:1–9. doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(09)00461-6. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources