Re: Tumour progression or pseudoprogression? A review of posttreatment radiological appearances of glioblastoma. A reply

Affiliations

¹ Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
² Norfolk & Norwich University NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK. Electronic address: Sarah.abdulla@nnuh.nhs.uk.

Comment

S Jeffries et al. Clin Radiol. 2016 May.

. 2016 May;71(5):496-7.

doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Mar 8.

¹ Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
² Norfolk & Norwich University NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK. Electronic address: Sarah.abdulla@nnuh.nhs.uk.

No abstract available

Comment on

Tumour progression or pseudoprogression? A review of post-treatment radiological appearances of glioblastoma.
Abdulla S, Saada J, Johnson G, Jefferies S, Ajithkumar T. Abdulla S, et al. Clin Radiol. 2015 Nov;70(11):1299-312. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.06.096. Epub 2015 Aug 10. Clin Radiol. 2015. PMID: 26272530 Review.
Re: Tumour progression or pseudoprogression? A review of post-treatment radiological appearances of glioblastoma.
Booth TC, Ashkan K, Brazil L, Jäger R, Waldman AD. Booth TC, et al. Clin Radiol. 2016 May;71(5):495-6. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.01.014. Epub 2016 Feb 16. Clin Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26896081 No abstract available.