Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 11:16:209.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2230-4.

The effect of visceral obesity on clinicopathological features in patients with endometrial cancer: a retrospective analysis of 200 Chinese patients

Affiliations

The effect of visceral obesity on clinicopathological features in patients with endometrial cancer: a retrospective analysis of 200 Chinese patients

Shuang Ye et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: To assess the effect of visceral adiposity on clinical and pathological characteristics in patients with endometrial cancer.

Methods: A retrospective review of medical documentation was performed in surgically treated endometrial cancer patients from January to November 2015 in our institution. The visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) were measured at the level of umbilicus on single-slice computerized tomography. Visceral adiposity (VAT%) was calculated as VAT/(VAT + SAT).

Results: A total of 200 cases were included in the study. Median age at diagnosis was 54 years old. Most patients presented with early-stage tumor (86.0% for I + II) and endometrioid histology (90.5%). Positive lymph node occurred in 11.0% (22/200) of the patients with the median number of retrieved nodes as 25 (range, 4-56). The entire population had a median body mass index (BMI) of 24.7 kg/m(2) and median VAT% of 31.89%. BMI correlated with total adipose tissue (correlation coefficient = 0.667, P < 0.001), but not with VAT% (P = 0.495). Viscerally obese patients tended to be old and post-menopausal (P < 0.001; P = 0.003). Nodal metastasis and extrauterine disease were more commonly reported in patients with high VAT% (6.0% vs. 16.0%, P = 0.024; 9.0% vs. 19.0%, P = 0.042, respectively). Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to discern the contribution of variable factors on the lymph node metastasis. Grade (HR = 15.41, 95% CI = 1.60-148.76; P = 0.018), lympho-vascular invasion (HR = 449.61, 95% CI = 31.27-6463.93; P < 0.001) and high VAT% (HR = 6.37, 95% CI = 1.42-28.69; P = 0.016) retained statistical significance for predicting lymph node metastasis.

Conclusions: Viscerally obese patients were more likely to be old and have positive lymph node as well as extrauterine disease. Grade, lympho-vascular invasion presence and visceral adiposity were predictors of nodal disease.

Keywords: Body mass index; Clinicopathological features; Endometrial cancer; Lymph node metastasis; Visceral adiposity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic of patients included in the present study. On searching the electronic medical record database, 325 endometrial cancer patients were discharged from our department from 1 January to 1 November 2015. A total of 283 patients underwent primary surgery during the study period. Among them, 83 cases were excluded due to the following reasons: no available CT scan (n = 57), incomplete information (n = 9), concurrent primary ovarian cancer (n = 4), uterine carcinosarcoma (n = 2) and lymphadenectomy not performed (n = 11)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Measurements of visceral (Pink color) and subcutaneous (blue color) adipose tissue on computerized tomography images. a/b represents different body fat distribution: both patients’ body mass index is 24.7 kg/m2, while the visceral adipose tissue percentage (VAT%) is 30.3 % (a) and 56.95 % (b), respectively
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Scatter-plots of body mass index versus different fat distribution parameters. Total adipose tissue (a), subcutaneous adipose tissue (b), visceral adipose tissue (c), and visceral adipose tissue percentage (d)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Burke WM, Orr J, Leitao M, Salom E, Gehrig P, Olawaiye AB, et al. Endometrial cancer: a review and current management strategies: part I. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134(2):385–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.05.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Delahanty RJ, Beeghly-Fadiel A, Xiang YB, Long J, Cai Q, Wen W, et al. Association of obesity-related genetic variants with endometrial cancer risk: a report from the Shanghai Endometrial Cancer Genetics Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(10):1115–26. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr233. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Popkin BM. The nutrition transition and obesity in the developing world. J Nutr. 2001;131(3):871s–3. - PubMed
    1. Friedenreich C, Cust A, Lahmann PH, Steindorf K, Boutron-Ruault MC, Clavel-Chapelon F, et al. Anthropometric factors and risk of endometrial cancer: the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Cancer Causes Control. 2007;18(4):399–413. doi: 10.1007/s10552-006-0113-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, Heller RF, Zwahlen M. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet. 2008;371(9612):569–78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60269-X. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources