Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul;26(7):982-990.
doi: 10.1002/pon.4119. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

Avoidant coping and self-efficacy mediate relationships between perceived social constraints and symptoms among long-term breast cancer survivors

Affiliations

Avoidant coping and self-efficacy mediate relationships between perceived social constraints and symptoms among long-term breast cancer survivors

Rebecca N Adams et al. Psychooncology. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: Many breast cancer survivors feel constrained in discussing their cancer experience with others. Limited evidence suggests that social constraints (e.g., avoidance and criticism) from loved ones may negatively impact breast cancer survivors' global health, but research has yet to examine relationships between social constraints and common physical symptoms. Informed by social cognitive processing theory, this study examined whether perceived social constraints from partners and healthcare providers (HCPs) were associated with fatigue, sleep disturbance, and attentional functioning among long-term breast cancer survivors (N = 1052). In addition, avoidant coping and self-efficacy for symptom management were examined as potential mediators of these relationships.

Methods: Long-term breast cancer survivors (mean years since diagnosis = 6) completed questionnaires assessing social constraints from partners and HCPs, avoidant coping, self-efficacy for symptom management, and symptoms (i.e., fatigue, sleep disturbance, and attentional functioning). Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate the hypothesized relationships among variables in two models: one focused on social constraints from partners and one focused on social constraints from HCPs.

Results: Both models demonstrated good fit. Consistent with theory and prior research, greater social constraints from both partners and HCPs were associated with greater symptom burden (i.e., greater fatigue and sleep disturbance, poorer attentional functioning). In addition, all relationships were mediated by avoidant coping and self-efficacy for symptom management.

Conclusions: Findings are consistent with social cognitive processing theory and suggest that symptom management interventions may be enhanced by addressing the impact of social constraints from survivors' partners and HCPs on their coping and self-efficacy. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords: breast cancer; coping; oncology; self-efficacy; social constraints; symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Final mediation models Note. Standardized coefficients for the final model. All paths are statistically significant. HCP = health care provider. Select demographic and medical factors were also included: age, education, income, time since diagnosis, and marital status. Specifically, in Figure 1a, there are paths from age to avoidant coping, self-efficacy, and each symptom. In addition, in Figure 1a, there are paths from education to self-efficacy and each symptom. Finally, in Figure 1a, there are paths from income to avoidant coping and each symptom. In Figure 1b, there are paths from age to avoidant coping, self-efficacy, and each symptom. In addition, in Figure 1b, there are paths from education to self-efficacy and each symptom. Finally, in Figure 1b, there are paths from income to avoidant coping, self-efficacy, and each symptom. Parameter estimates for these pathways are included in online supporting information 2 and 3.

References

    1. Lepore S, Revenson T. Social constraints on disclosure and adjustment to cancer. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2007;1:313–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00013.x. - DOI
    1. Mosher CE, Johnson C, Dickler M, Norton L, Massie MJ, DuHamel K. Living with metastatic breast cancer: A qualitative analysis of physical, psychological, and social sequelae. Breast J. 2013;19:285–292. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12107. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cordova MJ, Cunningham LL, Carlson CR, Andrykowski MA. Social constraints, cognitive processing, and adjustment to breast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69:706–711. doi: 10.1037//0022-006X.69.4.706. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Graves KD, Jensen RE, Cañar J, et al. Through the lens of culture: Quality of life among Latina breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136:603–613. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2291-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lepore S. A social–cognitive processing model of emotional adjustment to cancer. In: Baum A, Andersen BL, editors. Psychosocial Interventions for Cancer. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2001. pp. 99–118.

MeSH terms