Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;28 Suppl 1(sup1):44-7.
doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1146212. Epub 2016 Mar 13.

Acceptability and willingness to use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among HIV-negative men who have sex with men in Switzerland

Affiliations

Acceptability and willingness to use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among HIV-negative men who have sex with men in Switzerland

Daniel Gredig et al. AIDS Care. 2016.

Abstract

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is discussed as an additional HIV prevention method targeting men who have sex with men (MSM). So far, PrEP has not been approved in Switzerland and only little is known about the acceptability of PrEP among MSM living in Switzerland. Given the slow uptake of PrEP among MSM in the USA, the objectives of the study were to investigate the acceptability for PrEP and to identify factors influencing the acceptability for this prevention method and the willingness to adopt it. During a 4-month period we conducted five focus group discussions with 23 consecutively sampled HIV-negative MSM aged 22-60 years living in Switzerland. We analyzed the data according to qualitative content analysis. The acceptability of PrEP varied considerably among the participants. Some would use PrEP immediately after its introduction in Switzerland because it provides an alternative to condoms which they are unable or unwilling to use. Others were more ambivalent towards PrEP but still considered it (1) an additional or alternative protection to regular condom use, (2) an option to engage in sexual activities with less worries and anxieties or (3) a protection during receptive anal intercourse independently of the sexual partner's protective behaviour. Some participants would not consider using PrEP at all: they do not see any benefit in PrEP as they have adopted safer sex practices and did not mention any problems with condom use. Others are still undecided and could imagine using an improved form of PrEP. The results provide a valuable basis for a model explaining the acceptability of PrEP among MSM and suggest including the personal HIV protection strategy in the considerations adopted.

Keywords: HIV/AIDS; acceptability; men having sex with men; pre-exposure prophylaxis; willingness to use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beyrer C., Baral S. D., van Griensven F., Goodreau S. M., Chariyalertsak S., Wirtz A. L., Brookmeyer R. Global epidemiology of HIV infection in men who have sex with men. The Lancet. 2012;(9839):367–377. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60821-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bil J., Stolte I., van der Veldt W., Davidovich U. 2014 Motives and barriers to use pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV-infection among men having sex with men (MSM): A qualitative study. Poster THPE188. Paper presented at the 20th International AIDS Conference, Melbourne.
    1. Galea J. T., Kinsler J. J., Salazar X., Lee S.-J., Giron M., Sayles J. N., Cunningham W. E. Acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis as an HIV prevention strategy: Barriers and facilitators to pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake among at-risk Peruvian populations. International Journal of STD & AIDS. 2011;(5):256–262. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2009.009255. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krueger R. A., Casey M. A. Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2015.
    1. Kruse J. Strukturierung versus Offenheit. Reflexive theoretische Sensibilisierung als Grundsatz und Herausforderung rekonstruktiver Forschung. In: Gredig D., Schnurr S., editors. Forschen in der Sozialen Arbeit. Exemplarische Antworten auf typische methodische Herausforderungen. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren; 2012. pp. 158–203.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources