Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Mar;17(3):e97-e108.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00380-0. Epub 2016 Mar 2.

Neurocognitive functioning and genetic variation in patients with primary brain tumours

Affiliations
Review

Neurocognitive functioning and genetic variation in patients with primary brain tumours

Jeffrey S Wefel et al. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Impairment of neurocognitive functioning is a common result of cerebral neoplasms and treatment, although there is substantial heterogeneity in the pattern and severity of neurocognitive dysfunction across individuals and tumour types. The effects of many clinical and patient characteristics on neurocognitive functioning have been documented, but little research has been devoted to understanding the effect of genetic variation on neurocognitive outcomes in patients with brain tumours. This Review highlights preliminary evidence that suggests an association between various genes and risk of adverse neurocognitive outcomes in patients with brain tumours. Studies include genes specific to neuronal function, and those associated with more systemic cellular regulation. Related scientific literature in other disease populations is briefly discussed to indicate additional candidate genes. We consider methodological issues central to the study of neurocognitive functioning and genetic associations for patients with brain tumours, and emphasise the need for future research integrating novel investigative techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency of cerebral tumors by region. Frontal (23%), Temporal (17%), Parietal (11%), Occipital (3%), Cerebellum (5%).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Word cloud representing frequently impaired domains of neurocognitive functioning. Larger font indicates greater frequency of impairment observed on formal neuropsychological testing.,
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flow diagram outlining the case-control genetic association method.

References

    1. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Liao P, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007–2011. Neuro Oncol. 2014;16(suppl 4):iv1–iv63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tran B, Rosenthal M. Survival comparison between glioblastoma multiforme and other incurable cancers. J Clin Neurosci. 2010;17(4):417–421. - PubMed
    1. Pignatti F, van den Bent M, Curran D, et al. Prognostic factors for survival in adult patients with cerebral low-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(8):2076–2084. - PubMed
    1. Habets EJ, Kloet A, Walchenbach R, Vecht CJ, Klein M, Taphoorn MJ. Tumour and surgery effects on cognitive functioning in high-grade glioma patients. Acta Neurochir. 2014;156(8):1451–1459. - PubMed
    1. Tucha O, Smely C, Preier M, Lange KW. Cognitive deficits before treatment among patients with brain tumors. Neurosurgery. 2000;47(2):324–334. - PubMed

Publication types