Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar;2(1):75-83.
doi: 10.1007/s12052-008-0096-x. Epub 2008 Nov 19.

Assessment of Biology Majors' Versus Nonmajors' Views on Evolution, Creationism, and Intelligent Design

Affiliations

Assessment of Biology Majors' Versus Nonmajors' Views on Evolution, Creationism, and Intelligent Design

Guillermo Paz-Y-Miño C et al. Evolution (N Y). 2009 Mar.

Abstract

The controversy around evolution, creationism, and intelligent design resides in a historical struggle between scientific knowledge and popular belief. Four hundred seventy-six students (biology majors n=237, nonmajors n=239) at a secular liberal arts private university in Northeastern United States responded to a five-question survey to assess their views about: (1) evolution, creationism, and intelligent design in the science class; (2) students' attitudes toward evolution; (3) students' position about the teaching of human evolution; (4) evolution in science exams; and (5) students' willingness to discuss evolution openly. There were 60.6% of biology majors and 42% of nonmajors supported the exclusive teaching of evolution in the science class, while 45.3% of nonmajors and 32% of majors were willing to learn equally about evolution, creationism, and intelligent design (question 1); 70.5% of biology majors and 55.6% of nonmajors valued the factual explanations evolution provides about the origin of life and its place in the universe (question 2); 78% of the combined responders (majors plus nonmajors) preferred science courses where evolution is discussed comprehensively and humans are part of it (question 3); 69% of the combined responders (majors plus nonmajors) had no problem answering questions concerning evolution in science exams (question 4); 48.1% of biology majors and 26.8% of nonmajors accepted evolution and expressed it openly, but 18.2% of the former and 14.2% of the latter accepted evolution privately; 46% of nonmajors and 29.1% of biology majors were reluctant to comment on this topic (question 5). Combined open plus private acceptance of evolution within biology majors increased with seniority, from freshman (60.7%) to seniors (81%), presumably due to gradual exposure to upper-division biology courses with evolutionary content. College curricular/pedagogical reform should fortify evolution literacy at all education levels, particularly among nonbiologists.

Keywords: Assessment; College education; Creationism; Evolution; Intelligent design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Percentage of biology majors (black bars, n=231) and nonmajors (white bars, n=236) who consider one of the following explanations about the origin and development of life on Earth should be taught in science classes: A = evolution, B = equal time to evolution, creationism, intelligent design, and C = do not know enough to say. Raw data chi-square=16.594, df=2, P value≤0.001; asterisks indicate Sign test two-tail pair-wise comparisons P value≤0.02. b Percentage of freshman (F), sophomore (So), junior (J), and senior (Sr) biology majors who consider that A, B, or C (above) should be taught in science classes. Chi-square of percentage values=22.129, df=6, P value=0.001
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Percentage of biology majors (black bars, n=237) and nonmajors (white bars, n=239) who think one of the following statements fits best their position concerning evolution: A = hearing about evolution makes me appreciate the factual explanation about the origin of life on Earth and its place in the universe, B = hearing about evolution makes no difference to me because evolution and creationism are in harmony, C = do not know enough to say, D = hearing about evolution makes me uncomfortable because it is in conflict with my faith, and E = hearing about evolution makes me realize how wrong scientists are concerning explanations about the origin of life on Earth and the universe. Raw data chi-square=19.725, df=4, P≤0.001; asterisks indicate Sign test two-tail pair-wise comparisons A—P value=0.056, C—P value≤0.01. b Percentage of freshman (F), sophomore (So), junior (J), and senior (Sr) biology majors who think statements A, B, or C (above) fit best their position concerning evolution (D and E were excluded from the analysis because over 20% of their expected values were less than 5). Chi-square of percentage values=17.418, df=6, P value=0.008
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a Percentage of biology majors (black bars, n=234) and nonmajors (white bars, n=227) who agree with one of the following statements concerning their own education: A = I prefer science courses where evolution is discussed comprehensively and humans are part of it, B = I prefer science courses where plant and animal evolution is discussed but not human evolution, and C = do not know enough to say. Raw data chi-square=11.879, df=2, P≤0.01; asterisk indicate Sign test two-tail pair-wise comparison P≤0.01. b Percentage of freshman (F), sophomore (So), junior (J), and senior (Sr) biology majors who agree with statements A, B, or C (above) concerning their own education. Chi-square of percentage values=13.676, df=6, P value=0.033
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
a Percentage of biology majors (black bars, n=237) and nonmajors (white bars, n=239) who agree with one of the following statements concerning evolution in science exams: A = I have no problem answering questions concerning evolution, B = science exams should always include some questions concerning evolution, C = do not know enough to say, D = I prefer not to answer questions concerning evolution, and E = I never answer questions concerning evolution. Raw data chi-square=27.026, df=4, P≤0.001; asterisks indicate Sign test two-tail pair-wise comparisons P≤0.002. b Percentage of freshman (F), sophomore (So), junior (J), and senior (Sr) biology majors who agree with statements A, B, or C (above) concerning evolution in science exams (D and E were excluded from the analysis because over 20% of their expected values were less than 5). Chi-square of percentage values=15.316, df=6, P value=0.018
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
a Percentage of biology majors (black bars, n=237) and nonmajors (white bars, n=239) who consider one of the following statements describes them best: A = I accept evolution and express it openly regardless of other’s opinions, B = no opinion, C = I accept evolution but do not discuss it openly to avoid conflicts with friends and family, D = I believe in creationism and express it openly regardless of others’ opinions, and E = I believe in creationism but do not discuss it openly to avoid conflicts with friends and family. Raw data chi-square=34.573, df=4, P≤0.001; asterisks indicate Sign test two-tail pair-wise comparisons P≤0.04. b Percentage of freshman (F), sophomore (So), junior (J), and senior (Sr) biology majors who consider statements A, B, or C (above) describes them best (D and E were excluded from the analysis because over 20% of their expected values were less than 5). Chi-square of percentage values=14.535, df=6, P value=0.024

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brumfield G. Who has designs on your students’ minds. Nature. 2005;434:1062–5. - PubMed
    1. Dawkins R. The ancestor’s tale. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company; 2004.
    1. Ernst JD, Trevejo-Nuñez G, Banaiee N. Genomics and the evolution, pathogenesis, and diagnosis of tuberculosis. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:1738–45. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Forrest B, Gross RP. Creationism’s Trojan Horse: the wedge of intelligent design. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.
    1. Gould SJ. The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University; 2002.