Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 11:16:7.
doi: 10.1186/s12878-016-0046-8. eCollection 2016.

Randomized double-blind safety comparison of intravenous iron dextran versus iron sucrose in an adult non-hemodialysis outpatient population: A feasibility study

Affiliations

Randomized double-blind safety comparison of intravenous iron dextran versus iron sucrose in an adult non-hemodialysis outpatient population: A feasibility study

Martha L Louzada et al. BMC Hematol. .

Abstract

Background: Intravenous iron therapy is a treatment option for iron deficient patients who are intolerant to oral iron or where oral iron is ineffective, but with possible adverse effects. Currently, prospective studies comparing different intravenous iron formulations are needed to determine safety and efficacy of these agents.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the feasibility of a trial comparing the safety of high molecular weight intravenous iron dextran, Infufer®, with intravenous iron sucrose, Venofer®, in non-hemodialysis adult outpatients. Primary outcome was the occurrence of immediate severe drug reactions.

Results: We enrolled 143 patients in a one-year period. Overall, 45/143 (31.5 %) patients (20 iron dextran, 25 iron sucrose) developed 48 infusion reactions (14 immediate, 28 delayed, and 3 both). The risk of an immediate reaction was similar in both groups, 9/73 (12.3 %) iron dextran versus 8/70 (11.4 %) iron sucrose, RR = 0.93 (95 % CI; 0.38 to 2.27). The risk of a delayed reaction was significantly higher in the iron sucrose group 22/70 (31.4 %) versus the iron dextran group 9/73 (12.3 %), RR = 2.55 (95 % CI; 1.26 to 5.15; p = 0.0078).

Conclusion: In this limited feasibility study, no major differences in immediate reactions were seen, but a significantly higher number of delayed reactions were seen in the iron sucrose group. Further, under our assumptions and design a full RCT to evaluate the safety of different intravenous iron preparations is not feasible. Future studies should consider modifying the clinical outcomes, utilize multiple centers, and consider other emerging parenteral iron formulations. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT005936197 January 3, 2008).

Keywords: Feasibility; Intravenous iron; Iron dextran; Iron sucrose; Randomized controlled trial; Safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow diagram. *Reaction assessment performed during infusion (immediate reaction) and at 24 h post infusion
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of reactions

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. 2014 Annual Results Report: Nutrition. New York: UNICEF; 2015. p. 23. http://www.unicef.org/publicpartnerships/files/2014_Annual_Results_Repor.... Accessed 10 March 2016.
    1. Christofides A, Schauer C, Zlotkin SH. Iron deficiency anemia among children: addressing a global public health problem within a Canadian context. Paediatr Child Health. 2005;10(10):597–601. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McClung JP, Marchitelli LJ, Friedl KE, Young AJ. Prevalence of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia among three populations of female military personnel in the US Army. J Am Coll Nutr. 2006;25(1):64–69. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2006.10719516. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kruske S, Ruben A, Brewster D. An iron treatment trial in an aboriginal community: improving non-adherence. J Paediatr Child Health. 1999;35:153. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.1999.t01-1-00351.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Auerbach M, Rodgers GM. Intravenous iron. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(1):93–94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc070203. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources