Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul;41(7):515-21.
doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001197.

68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in Patients With Biochemical Prostate Cancer Recurrence and Negative 18F-Choline-PET/CT

Affiliations

68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in Patients With Biochemical Prostate Cancer Recurrence and Negative 18F-Choline-PET/CT

Christina Bluemel et al. Clin Nucl Med. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: Investigating the value of Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in biochemically recurring prostate cancer patients with negative F-choline-PET/CT.

Patients and methods: One hundred thirty-nine consecutive patients with biochemical recurrence after curative (surgery and/or radiotherapy) therapy were offered participation in this sequential clinical imaging approach. Patients first underwent an F-choline-PET/CT. If negative, an additional Ga-PSMA-PET/CT was offered. One hundred twenty-five of 139 eligible patients were included in the study; 32 patients underwent additional Ga-PSMA-PET/CT. Patients with equivocal findings (n = 5) on F-choline-PET/CT and those who declined the additional Ga-PSMA-PET/CT (n = 9) were excluded. Images were analyzed visually for the presence of suspicious lesions. Findings on PET/CT were correlated with PSA level, PSA doubling time (dt), and PSA velocity (vel).

Results: The overall detection rates were 85.6% (107/125) for the sequential imaging approach and 74.4% (93/125) for F-choline-PET/CT alone. Ga-PSMA-PET/CT detected sites of recurrence in 43.8% (14/32) of the choline-negative patients. Detection rates of the sequential imaging approach and F-choline-PET/CT alone increased with higher serum PSA levels and PSA vel. Subgroup analysis of Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in F-choline negative patients revealed detection rates of 28.6%, 45.5%, and 71.4% for PSA levels of 0.2 or greater to less than 1 ng/mL, 1 to 2 ng/mL, and greater than 2 ng/mL, respectively.

Conclusions: The sequential imaging approach designed to limit Ga-PSMA imaging to patients with negative choline scans resulted in high detection rates. Ga-PSMA-PET/CT identified sites of recurrent disease in 43.8% of the patients with negative F-choline PET/CT scans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

and sources of funding: S.K. and H.J.W. are CEOs and shareholders of Scintomics, the company distributing PSMA-directed peptide ligands. Both coauthors have not influenced data acquisition or analysis but contributed to conception/design, drafting of manuscript, administrative, technical or material support, and supervision.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram: sequential imaging approach (n = 139 patients).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Detection rates in relation to PSA levels (A), PSA doubling time (B), and PSA velocity (C) at the time point of PET/CT (n = 125; PSA kinetics in 1 patient unavailable).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
A 64-year-old patient with PSA relapse (T3aN0; Gleason score, 8; PSA level, 4.0 ng/mL; PSA doubling time, 5.9 months) radical prostatectomy, lymphadenectomy, and radiotherapy. 18F-choline-PET/CT showed no suspicious lesion (AC); 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT (DF) showed multiple iliac and retroperitoneal lymph node metastases (arrows) without 18F-choline-uptake (arrows in panel A, B).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
A 72-year-old patient with PSA relapse (T2cN0; Gleason score, 7; PSA level, 1.43 ng/mL; PSA doubling, 17.6 months) after radical prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy. 18F-choline-PET/CT showed no suspicious lesion (AC), but 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT demonstrated local recurrence (DF, arrow).

References

    1. Uchio EM, Aslan M, Wells CK, et al. Impact of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer among US veterans. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1390–1395. - PubMed
    1. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2011;59:572–583. - PubMed
    1. Pfister D, Bolla M, Briganti A, et al. Early salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2014;65:1034–1043. - PubMed
    1. Trock BJ, Han M, Freedland SJ, et al. Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2008;299:2760–2769. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schiavina R, Ceci F, Borghesi M, et al. The dilemma of localizing disease relapse after radical treatment for prostate cancer: which is the value of the actual imaging techniques? Curr Radiopharm. 2013;6:92–95. - PubMed

MeSH terms