Agreement between an online dietary assessment tool (myfood24) and an interviewer-administered 24-h dietary recall in British adolescents aged 11-18 years
- PMID: 26975650
- DOI: 10.1017/S0007114516000593
Agreement between an online dietary assessment tool (myfood24) and an interviewer-administered 24-h dietary recall in British adolescents aged 11-18 years
Abstract
myfood24 Is an online 24-h dietary assessment tool developed for use among British adolescents and adults. Limited information is available regarding the validity of using new technology in assessing nutritional intake among adolescents. Thus, a relative validation of myfood24 against a face-to-face interviewer-administered 24-h multiple-pass recall (MPR) was conducted among seventy-five British adolescents aged 11-18 years. Participants were asked to complete myfood24 and an interviewer-administered MPR on the same day for 2 non-consecutive days at school. Total energy intake (EI) and nutrients recorded by the two methods were compared using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland-Altman plots (using between and within-individual information) and weighted κ to assess the agreement. Energy, macronutrients and other reported nutrients from myfood24 demonstrated strong agreement with the interview MPR data, and ICC ranged from 0·46 for Na to 0·88 for EI. There was no significant bias between the two methods for EI, macronutrients and most reported nutrients. The mean difference between myfood24 and the interviewer-administered MPR for EI was -230 kJ (-55 kcal) (95 % CI -490, 30 kJ (-117, 7 kcal); P=0·4) with limits of agreement ranging between 39 % (3336 kJ (-797 kcal)) lower and 34 % (2874 kJ (687 kcal)) higher than the interviewer-administered MPR. There was good agreement in terms of classifying adolescents into tertiles of EI (κ w =0·64). The agreement between day 1 and day 2 was as good for myfood24 as for the interviewer-administered MPR, reflecting the reliability of myfood24. myfood24 Has the potential to collect dietary data of comparable quality with that of an interviewer-administered MPR.
Keywords: Adolescents; CSD Children’s Social Desirability; EI energy intake; ICC intraclass correlation coefficient; Interviewer-administered 24-h recall; Myfood24; Online dietary assessment tools; Validation; YANA-C Young Adolescents’ Nutrition Assessment on computer; interview (MPR) interviewer-administered 24-h multiple-pass dietary recall; myfood24 Measure Your Food On One Day.
Similar articles
-
Validity of an online 24-h recall tool (myfood24) for dietary assessment in population studies: comparison with biomarkers and standard interviews.BMC Med. 2018 Aug 9;16(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1113-8. BMC Med. 2018. PMID: 30089491 Free PMC article.
-
Validity and reliability of an online self-report 24-h dietary recall method (Intake24): a doubly labelled water study and repeated-measures analysis.J Nutr Sci. 2019 Aug 30;8:e29. doi: 10.1017/jns.2019.20. eCollection 2019. J Nutr Sci. 2019. PMID: 31501691 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of the web-based self-administered 24-h dietary recall myfood24-Germany: comparison with a weighed dietary record and biomarkers.Eur J Nutr. 2021 Oct;60(7):4069-4082. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02547-7. Epub 2021 May 11. Eur J Nutr. 2021. PMID: 33974128 Free PMC article.
-
Selecting a dietary assessment method for a national nutrition survey: a review and evaluation of online 24-h dietary recall tools.Public Health Nutr. 2024 Dec 5;27(1):e264. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024002507. Public Health Nutr. 2024. PMID: 39632717 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Measuring diet in the 21st century: use of new technologies.Proc Nutr Soc. 2017 Aug;76(3):276-282. doi: 10.1017/S0029665116002883. Epub 2016 Dec 15. Proc Nutr Soc. 2017. PMID: 27976605 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of a Web-Based 24-h Dietary Recall Tool (Foodbook24) to an Interviewer-Led 24-h Dietary Recall.Nutrients. 2017 Apr 25;9(5):425. doi: 10.3390/nu9050425. Nutrients. 2017. PMID: 28441358 Free PMC article.
-
Validity of an online 24-h recall tool (myfood24) for dietary assessment in population studies: comparison with biomarkers and standard interviews.BMC Med. 2018 Aug 9;16(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1113-8. BMC Med. 2018. PMID: 30089491 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship of the Frequency, Distribution, and Content of Meals/Snacks to Glycaemic Control in Gestational Diabetes: The myfood24 GDM Pilot Study.Nutrients. 2019 Dec 18;12(1):3. doi: 10.3390/nu12010003. Nutrients. 2019. PMID: 31861337 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of Factors Necessary for Enabling Technology-Based Dietary Record Surveys: A Qualitative Focus Group Interview with Japanese Dietitians.Nutrients. 2022 Oct 18;14(20):4357. doi: 10.3390/nu14204357. Nutrients. 2022. PMID: 36297041 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of New Technology-Based Tools for Dietary Intake Assessment-An ILSI Europe Dietary Intake and Exposure Task Force Evaluation.Nutrients. 2018 Dec 28;11(1):55. doi: 10.3390/nu11010055. Nutrients. 2018. PMID: 30597864 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources