Trusting Social Media as a Source of Health Information: Online Surveys Comparing the United States, Korea, and Hong Kong
- PMID: 26976273
- PMCID: PMC4810010
- DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4193
Trusting Social Media as a Source of Health Information: Online Surveys Comparing the United States, Korea, and Hong Kong
Abstract
Background: The Internet has increasingly become a popular source of health information by connecting individuals with health content, experts, and support. More and more, individuals turn to social media and Internet sites to share health information and experiences. Although online health information seeking occurs worldwide, limited empirical studies exist examining cross-cultural differences in perceptions about user-generated, experience-based information compared to expertise-based information sources.
Objective: To investigate if cultural variations exist in patterns of online health information seeking, specifically in perceptions of online health information sources. It was hypothesized that Koreans and Hongkongers, compared to Americans, would be more likely to trust and use experience-based knowledge shared in social Internet sites, such as social media and online support groups. Conversely, Americans, compared to Koreans and Hongkongers, would value expertise-based knowledge prepared and approved by doctors or professional health providers more.
Methods: Survey questionnaires were developed in English first and then translated into Korean and Chinese. The back-translation method ensured the standardization of questions. Surveys were administered using a standardized recruitment strategy and data collection methods.
Results: A total of 826 participants living in metropolitan areas from the United States (n=301), Korea (n=179), and Hong Kong (n=337) participated in the study. We found significant cultural differences in information processing preferences for online health information. A planned contrast test revealed that Koreans and Hongkongers showed more trust in experience-based health information sources (blogs: t451.50=11.21, P<.001; online support group: t455.71=9.30, P<.001; social networking sites [SNS]: t466.75=11.36, P<.001) and also reported using blogs (t515.31=6.67, P<.001) and SNS (t529.22=4.51, P<.001) more frequently than Americans. Americans showed a stronger preference for using expertise-based information sources (eg, WebMD and CDC) compared to Koreans and Hongkongers (t360.02=3.01, P=.003). Trust in expertise-based information sources was universal, demonstrating no cultural differences (Brown-Forsythe F2,654=1.82, P=.16). Culture also contributed significantly to differences in searching information on behalf of family members (t480.38=5.99, P<.001) as well as to the goals of information searching.
Conclusions: This research found significant cultural differences in information processing preferences for online health information. Further discussion is included regarding effective communication strategies in providing quality health information.
Keywords: consumer behavior; consumer health information; culture; information sharing; medical informatics; social media; trust.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Social Media as a Platform for Cancer Care Decision-Making Among Women: Internet Survey-Based Study on Trust, Engagement, and Preferences.JMIR Cancer. 2025 Mar 5;11:e64724. doi: 10.2196/64724. JMIR Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40053770 Free PMC article.
-
It's better to give than to receive: the role of social support, trust, and participation on health-related social networking sites.J Health Commun. 2014 Dec;19(12):1424-39. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.894596. Epub 2014 Apr 25. J Health Commun. 2014. PMID: 24766297
-
Sharing health information online in South Korea: motives, topics, and antecedents.Health Promot Int. 2019 Apr 1;34(2):182-192. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dax074. Health Promot Int. 2019. PMID: 29040499
-
The Role of Trust When Adolescents Search for and Appraise Online Health Information.J Pediatr. 2020 Jun;221:215-223.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.02.074. J Pediatr. 2020. PMID: 32446485
-
Assessment of the use of the Internet and social media among people with bladder cancer and their carers, and the quality of available patient-centric online resources: a systematic review.BJU Int. 2019 May;123 Suppl 5:10-18. doi: 10.1111/bju.14720. Epub 2019 Apr 23. BJU Int. 2019. PMID: 30801892
Cited by
-
HARNESSING SOCIAL MEDIA FOR HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT.Electron Commer Res Appl. 2018 Jan-Feb;27:139-151. doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 29. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2018. PMID: 30147636 Free PMC article.
-
Online Health (Mis)Information: The Role of Medical Students.Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 21;11(1):21. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11010021. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36611481 Free PMC article.
-
Use of social media for COVID-19-related information and associated factors among health professionals in Northwest Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.Digit Health. 2022 Jul 11;8:20552076221113394. doi: 10.1177/20552076221113394. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2022. PMID: 35847528 Free PMC article.
-
Experimental effects of fitspiration messaging on body satisfaction, exercise motivation, and exercise behavior among college women and men.Transl Behav Med. 2021 Jul 29;11(7):1441-1450. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab016. Transl Behav Med. 2021. PMID: 33739424 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Health information on social media. Perceptions, attitudes, and practices of patients and their companions.Saudi Med J. 2019 Dec;40(12):1294-1298. doi: 10.15537/smj.2019.12.24682. Saudi Med J. 2019. PMID: 31828284 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fox S, Duggan M. Pew Research Center. 2013. Jan 15, Health online 2013 http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/
-
- Fox S. Pew Research Center. 2011. Feb 28, Peer-to-peer healthcare http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/P2PHealthcare.aspx .
-
- Tuckett D, Boulton M, Olson C, Williams A. Meetings Between Experts: An Approach to Sharing Ideas in Medical Consultations. London: Tavistock; 1985.
-
- Metzger MJ, Flanagin AJ, Medders R. Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. J Commun. 2010;60(3):413–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous