Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;36(3):845-52.

Heterochromatin Protein 1 Binding Protein 3 Expression as a Candidate Marker of Intrinsic 5-Fluorouracil Resistance

Affiliations

Heterochromatin Protein 1 Binding Protein 3 Expression as a Candidate Marker of Intrinsic 5-Fluorouracil Resistance

Jamie N Hadac et al. Anticancer Res. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Despite receiving post-operative 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy, approximately 50% of patients with stage IIIC colon cancer experience recurrence. Currently, no molecular signature can predict response to 5-FU.

Materials and methods: Mouse models of colon cancer have been developed and characterized. Individual tumors in these mice can be longitudinally monitored and assessed to identify differences between those that are responsive and those that are resistant to therapy. Gene expression was analyzed in serial biopsies that were collected before and after treatment with 5-FU. Colon tumors had heterogeneous responses to treatment with 5-FU. Microarray analysis of pre-treatment biopsies revealed that Hp1bp3, a gene encoding heterochromatin protein 1 binding protein 3, was differentially expressed between sensitive and resistant tumors.

Conclusion: Using mouse models of human colorectal cancer, Hp1bp3 was identified as a candidate marker of intrinsic 5-FU resistance and may represent a potential biomarker for patient stratification or a target of clinical importance.

Keywords: 5-fluorouracil; Colorectal cancer; chemotherapy; heterochromatin protein 1 binding protein 3; intrinsic resistance; mouse models.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests

The Authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Categorization of F1.Min tumor response to 5-FU. F1.Min tumors exhibit both resistance and sensitivity to 5-FU as evidenced by tumor size changes. Panel A shows the parameters used to categorize tumor size changes into response. Panel B shows tumors that are sensitive, unclassifiable, and resistant, before and following treatment. Panel C shows median and quartiles for the sensitive and resistant tumors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overexpression of Hp1bp3 in tumors is a marker of tumor resistance. The level of Hp1bp3 in sensitive and resistant tumors before and after treatment was determined by quantitative PCR. Tumors that were classified as sensitive had lower levels of Hp1bp3 expression (0.86±0.18-fold change over normal colon epithelium; n=9) than tumors that were classified as resistant (1.28±0.18-fold change over normal colon epithelium; n=9). This difference was statistically significant (p<0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test). All sensitive tumors had tissue that persisted throughout 5-FU treatment as none fully responded. These tissue samples, along with post-treatment samples of resistant tumors, were analyzed for Hp1bp3 expression. Expression levels were not significantly different when comparing tissue that persisted after treatment in sensitive tumors and tissue from resistant tumors (p=0.44).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Hp1bp3 expression varies between tumors. Hp1bp3 expression was analyzed in 26 tumors; some were later treated with 5-FU and determined to be sensitive or resistant, while others were not treated. Tumors ranged from 0.56–2.30-fold change with a median of 1.16 compared to normal intestinal epithelium. The median is denoted by the horizontal dotted line. All tumors that were sensitive to 5-FU are below the median; 8/9 resistant tumors were above the median (Fisher’s exact test, p<0.001).
Figure 4
Figure 4
c-Myc expression is low in F1.Min tumors and does not predict resistance. F1.Min tumors had low c-Myc expression both before and after treatment compared to normal colon epithelium. There was no significant difference (Wilcoxon rank sum test, p=0.47) in c-Myc levels between sensitive (0.80±0.23-fold change) and resistant tumors (0.92±0.32 fold change) prior to treatment. Following treatment, c-Myc levels also were not distinguishable between sensitive and resistant tumors (Wilcoxon rank sum test, p=0.42).

References

    1. Cheung WY, Renfro LA, Kerr D, de Gramont A, Saltz LB, Grothey A, Alberts SR, Andre T, Guthrie KA, Labianca R, Francini G, Seitz JF, O’Callaghan C, Twelves C, Van Cutsem E, Haller DG, Yothers G, Sargent DJ. Determinants of Early Mortality Among 37,568 Patients With Colon Cancer Who Participated in 25 Clinical Trials From the Adjuvant Colon Cancer Endpoints Database. J Clin Oncol. 2016 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.1158. [ahead of print] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holohan C, Van Schaeybroeck S, Longley DB, Johnston PG. Cancer drug resistance: an evolving paradigm. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:714–726. - PubMed
    1. Klopfleisch R, Kohn B, Gruber AD. Mechanisms of tumour resistance against chemotherapeutic agents in veterinary oncology. Vet J. 2016;207:63–72. - PubMed
    1. Lievre A, Bachet JB, Le Corre D, Boige V, Landi B, Emile JF, Cote JF, Tomasic G, Penna C, Ducreux M, Rougier P, Penault-Llorca F, Laurent-Puig P. KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3992–3995. - PubMed
    1. Nakanishi R, Kitao H, Fujinaka Y, Yamashita N, Iimori M, Tokunaga E, Yamashita N, Morita M, Kakeji Y, Maehara Y. FANCJ expression predicts the response to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in MLH1-proficient colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3627–3635. - PubMed

Publication types