Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:2016:8938420.
doi: 10.1155/2016/8938420. Epub 2016 Feb 10.

Impacts of Québec Primary Healthcare Reforms on Patients' Experience of Care, Unmet Needs, and Use of Services

Affiliations

Impacts of Québec Primary Healthcare Reforms on Patients' Experience of Care, Unmet Needs, and Use of Services

Raynald Pineault et al. Int J Family Med. 2016.

Abstract

Introduction. Healthcare reforms launched in the early 2000s in Québec, Canada, involved the implementation of new forms of primary healthcare (PHC) organizations: Family Medicine Groups (FMGs) and Network Clinics (NCs). The objective of this paper is to assess how the organizational changes associated with these reforms have impact on patients' experience of care, use of services, and unmet needs. Methods. We conducted population and organization surveys in 2005 and 2010 in two regions of the province of Québec. The design was a before-and-after natural experiment. Changes over time between new models and other practices were assessed using difference-in-differences statistical procedures. Results. Accessibility decreased between 2003 and 2010, but less so in the treatment than in the comparison group. Continuity of care generally improved, but the increase was less for patients in the treatment group. Responsiveness also increased during the period and more so in the treatment group. There was no other significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion. PHC reform in Québec has brought about major organizational changes that have translated into slight improvements in accessibility of care and responsiveness. However, the reform does not seem to have had an impact on continuity, comprehensiveness, perceived care outcomes, use of services, and unmet needs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design.

References

    1. Davis K., Stremikis K., Squires D., Schoen C. Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: How the Performance of The U.S. Healthcare System Compares Internationally. Vol. 1755. The Commonwealth Fund; 2014.
    1. The College of Family Physicians of Canada. A vision for Canada: Family practice—The Patient's Medical Home, 2011.
    1. Barr V. J., Robinson S., Marin-Link B., et al. The expanded chronic care model: an integration of concept and strategies from population health promotion and the chronic care model. Hospital Quarterly. 2003;7(1):73–82. - PubMed
    1. Starfield B., Shi L., Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Quarterly. 2005;83(3):457–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haggerty J. L., Lévesque J.-F., Hogg W., Wong S. The strength of primary care systems. British Medical Journal. 2013;346(7914) doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3777.f3777 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources