Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0150205.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150205. eCollection 2016.

Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Framework

Sandra M Eldridge  1 , Gillian A Lancaster  2 , Michael J Campbell  3 , Lehana Thabane  4 , Sally Hopewell  5 , Claire L Coleman  1 , Christine M Bond  6
Affiliations

Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Framework

Sandra M Eldridge et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

We describe a framework for defining pilot and feasibility studies focusing on studies conducted in preparation for a randomised controlled trial. To develop the framework, we undertook a Delphi survey; ran an open meeting at a trial methodology conference; conducted a review of definitions outside the health research context; consulted experts at an international consensus meeting; and reviewed 27 empirical pilot or feasibility studies. We initially adopted mutually exclusive definitions of pilot and feasibility studies. However, some Delphi survey respondents and the majority of open meeting attendees disagreed with the idea of mutually exclusive definitions. Their viewpoint was supported by definitions outside the health research context, the use of the terms 'pilot' and 'feasibility' in the literature, and participants at the international consensus meeting. In our framework, pilot studies are a subset of feasibility studies, rather than the two being mutually exclusive. A feasibility study asks whether something can be done, should we proceed with it, and if so, how. A pilot study asks the same questions but also has a specific design feature: in a pilot study a future study, or part of a future study, is conducted on a smaller scale. We suggest that to facilitate their identification, these studies should be clearly identified using the terms 'feasibility' or 'pilot' as appropriate. This should include feasibility studies that are largely qualitative; we found these difficult to identify in electronic searches because researchers rarely used the term 'feasibility' in the title or abstract of such studies. Investigators should also report appropriate objectives and methods related to feasibility; and give clear confirmation that their study is in preparation for a future randomised controlled trial designed to assess the effect of an intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE disclosure form at http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare support from the following organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work – Queen Mary University of London, Sheffield University, NIHR, Chief Scientist Office Scotland; financial relationships with NIHR, MRC, EC FP7, Canadian Institute for Health Research, Wiley, who might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years. No other relationships or activities have influenced the submitted work. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. NIHR definitions [5, 6].
Fig 2
Fig 2. Definitions of pilot and feasibility studies used in on-line Delphi survey.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Examples of different types of pilot and feasibility study used in the on-line Delphi survey [10, 11, 12].
Fig 4
Fig 4. Quotes from the on-line Delphi survey.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Four propositions presented at Edinburgh open meeting.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Flow chart showing identification of empirical pilot and feasibility studies.
Fig 7
Fig 7. Conceptual framework.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. 2004;10(2):307–12. Epub 2004/06/11. 10.1111/j.2002.384.doc.x . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. British Medical Journal. 2008;337. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, et al. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC medical research methodology. 2010;10:1 Epub 2010/01/08. 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2824145. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arain M, Campbell MJ, Cooper CL, Lancaster GA. What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC medical research methodology. 2010;10:67 Epub 2010/07/20. 10.1186/1471-2288-10-67 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2912920. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health Research. NIHR Evaluation, Trials and Studies | Glossary 2015. Available: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/glossary/feasibility-studies. Accessed 2015 Mar 17.

Publication types