Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Aug;19(12):2122-7.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980016000483. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

Colour correct: the interactive effects of food label nutrition colouring schemes and food category healthiness on health perceptions

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Colour correct: the interactive effects of food label nutrition colouring schemes and food category healthiness on health perceptions

Gergely Nyilasy et al. Public Health Nutr. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of food label nutrition colouring schemes in interaction with food category healthiness on consumers' perceptions of food healthiness. Three streams of colour theory (colour attention, colour association and colour approach-avoidance) in interaction with heuristic processing theory provide consonant predictions and explanations for the underlying psychological processes.

Design: A 2 (food category healthiness: healthy v. unhealthy)×3 (food label nutrient colouring schemes: healthy=green, unhealthy=red (HGUR) v. healthy=red, unhealthy=green (HRUG) v. no colour (control)) between-subjects design was used.

Setting: The research setting was a randomised-controlled experiment using varying formats of food packages and nutritional information colouring.

Subjects: Respondents (n 196) sourced from a national consumer panel, USA.

Results: The findings suggest that, for healthy foods, the nutritional colouring schemes reduced perceived healthiness, irrespective of which nutrients were coloured red or green (healthinesscontrol=4·86; healthinessHGUR=4·10; healthinessHRUG=3·70). In contrast, for unhealthy foods, there was no significant difference in perceptions of food healthiness when comparing different colouring schemes against the control.

Conclusions: The results make an important qualification to the common belief that colour coding can enhance the correct interpretation of nutrition information and suggest that this incentive may not necessarily support healthier food choices in all situations.

Keywords: Colour theory; Food labelling; Food marketing; Heuristic processing; Nutritional information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Stimulus materials for the six conditions for the 2 (food category healthiness: healthy v. unhealthy) × 3 (food label nutrient colouring schemes: healthy=green, unhealthy=red (HGUR) v. healthy=red, unhealthy=green (HRUG) v. no colour) between-subjects design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Means plot for the significant interaction between food label nutrient colouring schemes (HGUR, healthy=green, unhealthy=red; HRUG, healthy=red, unhealthy=green) and food category healthiness (formula image, healthy; formula image, unhealthy) on perceptions of food healthiness among 196 respondents above the age of 18 years (males, n 82; females, n 114) sourced from a national consumer panel, USA

References

    1. European Commission (2007) A Strategy for Europe on Nutrition, Overweight and Obesity related health issues. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2007:0279:FIN:... (accessed May 2015).
    1. World Health Organization (2004) Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/strategy/eb11344/strategy_englis... (accessed May 2015).
    1. Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
    1. Grunert K & Wills J (2007) A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels. J Public Health 15, 385–399.
    1. Cowburn G & Stockley L (2005) Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 8, 21–28. - PubMed

Publication types