Test-retest reproducibility of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills for school-aged children with acquired brain injuries
- PMID: 26980287
- DOI: 10.3109/11038128.2016.1152296
Test-retest reproducibility of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills for school-aged children with acquired brain injuries
Abstract
Background Persistent impairments resulting from childhood acquired brain injury (ABI) can impact performance of activities of daily living (ADL). Objective and reliable measures of ADL skills are required for treatment planning and research. Aim To evaluate test-retest reproducibility of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) for children with ABI. Methods Twenty-eight children with ABI (mean age 11 years 7 months, SD 2 years 4 months; males = 11) were recruited. Two AMPS tasks were performed over two consecutive days, as per standardized AMPS procedures. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC; 2,1), standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable difference (SDD), and 95% limits of agreement (Bland-Altman) were calculated. Results Test-retest reliability was fair to good for AMPS ADL motor (ICC 0.55) and ADL process (ICC 0.58) measures. The SEM was 0.36 and 0.34 logits for AMPS ADL motor and ADL process measures respectively. The SDD was 1.0 (motor) and 0.93 logits (process) measures. A learning effect was evident. Conclusion Test-retest reproducibility of the AMPS was fair to good for children with ABI, which is poorer than previously published data. Administration of the AMPS in an unfamiliar environment, fatigue, and the small time interval between testing sessions may have contributed to poorer results. The AMPS remains a useful measure of ADL, contributing to our understanding of task execution processes.
Keywords: Activities of daily living; evaluation; occupational therapy; paediatric; reliability.
Similar articles
-
Test-retest Reproducibility of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy.Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2016;36(2):144-54. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2015.1076555. Epub 2015 Nov 25. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2016. PMID: 26606274 Clinical Trial.
-
Alternate forms reliability of the assessment of motor and process skills.J Outcome Meas. 1999;3(1):53-70. J Outcome Meas. 1999. PMID: 10063772
-
Differences in activities of daily living (ADL) abilities of children across world regions: a validity study of the assessment of motor and process skills.Child Care Health Dev. 2015 Mar;41(2):230-8. doi: 10.1111/cch.12170. Epub 2014 Jul 4. Child Care Health Dev. 2015. PMID: 25039374
-
Apathy and Depression as Predictors of Activities of Daily Living Following Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries in Adults: A Meta-Analysis.Neuropsychol Rev. 2022 Mar;32(1):51-69. doi: 10.1007/s11065-021-09501-8. Epub 2021 Mar 23. Neuropsychol Rev. 2022. PMID: 33759039 Review.
-
Review of four tests of gross motor development.Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001 Apr;43(4):279-85. doi: 10.1017/s0012162201000536. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001. PMID: 11305408 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Motor performance after treatment of pilocytic astrocytoma in the posterior fossa in childhood.Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2022 Aug;5(8):e1548. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1548. Epub 2021 Oct 12. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2022. PMID: 34643060 Free PMC article.
-
Test-retest reliability of myelin imaging in the human spinal cord: Measurement errors versus region- and aging-induced variations.PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0189944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189944. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29293550 Free PMC article.
-
Test-Retest Reliability of a Measure of Independence in Everyday Activities: The ADL Profile.Occup Ther Int. 2017 Jan 22;2017:3014579. doi: 10.1155/2017/3014579. eCollection 2017. Occup Ther Int. 2017. PMID: 29097964 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources