Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016;26(1):5-16.
doi: 10.11613/BM.2016.001.

Reference intervals: current status, recent developments and future considerations

Yesim Ozarda  1
Affiliations
Review

Reference intervals: current status, recent developments and future considerations

Yesim Ozarda. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2016.

Abstract

Reliable and accurate reference intervals (RIs) for laboratory analyses are an integral part of the process of correct interpretation of clinical laboratory test results. RIs given in laboratory reports have an important role in aiding the clinician in interpreting test results in reference to values for healthy populations. Since the 1980s, the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) has been proactive in establishing recommendations to clarify the true significance of the term 'RIs, to select the appropriate reference population and statistically analyse the data. The C28-A3 guideline published by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and IFCC is still the most widely-used source of reference in this area. In recent years, protocols additional to the Guideline have been published by the IFCC, Committee on Reference Intervals and Decision Limits (C-RIDL), including all details of multicenter studies on RIs to meet the requirements in this area. Multicentric RIs studies are the most important development in the area of RIs. Recently, the C-RIDL has performed many multicentric studies to obtain common RIs. Confusion of RIs and clinical decision limits (CDLs) remains an issue and pediatric and geriatric age groups are a significant problem. For future studies of RIs, the genetic effect would seem to be the most challenging area. The aim of the review is to present the current theory and practice of RIs, with special emphasis given to multicenter RIs studies, RIs studies for pediatric and geriatric age groups, clinical decision limits and partitioning by genetic effects on RIs.

Keywords: clinical decision limits; common reference intervals; genetic information; multicenter study; reference values.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

References

    1. Gräsbeck R, Fellman J. Normal values and statistics. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1968;21:193–5. 10.3109/00365516809076984 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gräsbeck R, Saris NE. Establishment and use of normal values. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1969;Suppl 110:62–3.
    1. Solberg HE. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry. Scientific committee, Clinical Section. Expert Panel on Theory of Reference Values and International Committee for Standardization in Haematology Standing Committee on Reference Values. Approved recommendation (1986) on the theory of reference values. Part 1. The concept of reference values. Clin Chim Acta. 1987;165:111–8. 10.1016/0009-8981(87)90224-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petit Clerc C, Solberg HE. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC). Approved recommendation on the theory of reference values. Part 2. Selection of individual for the production of reference value. Clin Chim Acta. 1987;170:S1–12. 10.1016/0009-8981(87)90150-1 - DOI
    1. Solberg HE, Petit Clerc C. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC). Approved recommendation on the theory of reference values. Part 3. Preparation of individuals and collection of the specimens for the production of reference values. Clin Chim Acta. 1988;177:S3–11. 10.1016/0009-8981(88)90074-5 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms