Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Mar 15:4:15.
doi: 10.1186/s40425-016-0118-0. eCollection 2016.

Immunodynamics: a cancer immunotherapy trials network review of immune monitoring in immuno-oncology clinical trials

Affiliations
Review

Immunodynamics: a cancer immunotherapy trials network review of immune monitoring in immuno-oncology clinical trials

Holbrook E Kohrt et al. J Immunother Cancer. .

Abstract

The efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 targeted therapies in addition to anti-CTLA-4 solidifies immunotherapy as a modality to add to the anticancer arsenal. Despite raising the bar of clinical efficacy, immunologically targeted agents raise new challenges to conventional drug development paradigms by highlighting the limited relevance of assessing standard pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). Specifically, systemic and intratumoral immune effects have not consistently correlated with standard relationships between systemic dose, toxicity, and efficacy for cytotoxic therapies. Hence, PK and PD paradigms remain inadequate to guide the selection of doses and schedules, both starting and recommended Phase 2 for immunotherapies. The promise of harnessing the immune response against cancer must also be considered in light of unique and potentially serious toxicities. Refining immune endpoints to better inform clinical trial design represents a high priority challenge. The Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network investigators review the immunodynamic effects of specific classes of immunotherapeutic agents to focus immune assessment modalities and sites, both systemic and importantly intratumoral, which are critical to the success of the rapidly growing field of immuno-oncology.

Keywords: Biomarker; Clinical trial; Immunotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF, Weber RW, Sosman JA, Haanen JB, et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;363(8):711–23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003466. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Galon J, Costes A, Sanchez-Cabo F, Kirilovsky A, Mlecnik B, Lagorce-Pages C, et al. Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome. Science (New York, NY) 2006;313(5795):1960–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1129139. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mlecnik B, Tosolini M, Kirilovsky A, Berger A, Bindea G, Meatchi T, et al. Histopathologic-based prognostic factors of colorectal cancers are associated with the state of the local immune reaction. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2011;29(6):610–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.5425. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Broussard EK, Disis ML. TNM staging in colorectal cancer: T is for T cell and M is for memory. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2011;29(6):601–3. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.9078. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fridman WH, Pages F, Sautes-Fridman C, Galon J. The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2012;12(4):298–306. doi: 10.1038/nrc3245. - DOI - PubMed