Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Mar 15:3:8.
doi: 10.1186/s40662-016-0040-z. eCollection 2016.

The use of intracorneal ring segments in keratoconus

Affiliations
Review

The use of intracorneal ring segments in keratoconus

Alfredo Vega-Estrada et al. Eye Vis (Lond). .

Abstract

Keratoconus is a corneal degeneration that usually appears during puberty and may seriously deteriorate the quality of life of the patients. This corneal disease is today the first indication of corneal transplantation in young patients. Until the last decade of the XX century, keratoplasty procedures were the only alternative to treat this pathological condition. In the beginning of the XXI century, intracorneal ring segments implantation was proposed as a therapeutic choice for treating keratoconus patients. Since then, several published articles have reported the benefits of this surgical procedure in treating this type of corneal ectatic disorder. The purpose of the present investigative work is to summarize the characteristic of the intracorneal ring segments and also to review the different features published in the literature in relation to this surgical technique for the treatment of keratoconus patients.

Keywords: Corneal ectasia; Intracorneal rings; Keratoconus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Intracorneal ring segment Keraring (Mediphacos)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Intracorneal ring segment Intacs (Addition technologies)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Topography of a patient implanted with a Myoring (Dioptex) showing the significantly flattening that is observed in the postoperative period: Map A: postoperative topography showing an average SimK of 58.32 D, Map B: preoperative topography showing an average SimK of 42.59 D)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Neovascularization of an ICRS

References

    1. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42:297–319. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6257(97)00119-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barnett M, Mannis MJ. Contact lenses in the management of keratoconus. Cornea. 2011;30:1510–6. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318211401f. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vega-Estrada A, Alió JL, Plaza Puche AB, Marshall J. Outcomes of a new microwave procedure followed by accelerated cross-linking for the treatment of keratoconus: a pilot study. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:787–93. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20121011-07. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Colin J, Cochener B, Savary G, Malet F. Correcting keratoconus with intracorneal rings. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:1117–22. doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00451-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Snibson GR. Collagen cross-linking: a new treatment paradigm in corneal disease - a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2010;38:141–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02228.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources